This is the course outline.
Petroleum provides the largest fraction of primary energy supply in the U.S. and in the world [Figure 1.1,eia1]. Resource consumption patterns shown in Figure 1.1 reflect major epochs in human history, such as The Industrial Revolution, ushering in the rapid increase in coal consumption. Petroleum trace, for example, marks the mass production of automobiles with the introduction of Model T by Ford, world wars, supply crises of 1973 and 1979 and the economic recession in 2008. Transportation of people and goods in many parts of the world depends almost completely on petroleum fuels, such as gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, and marine fuel. Apart from the fuels, materials that are necessary for operating the combustion engines of cars, trucks, planes, and trains also come from petroleum. These materials include lubricating oils (motor oils), greases, tires on the wheels of the vehicles, and asphalt to pave the roads for smooth rides in transportation vehicles. All petroleum fuels and many materials are produced by the processing of crude oil in petroleum refineries. Petroleum refineries also supply feedstock to the petrochemicals and chemical industry for producing all consumer goods from rubber and plastics (polymers) to cosmetics and medicine. Only ten percent of petroleum consumption, the portion that is not used for transportation or other energy outlets, is sufficient to manufacture all the materials used in human economy, with the exception of those derived from wood or minerals.
The petroleum industry consists of two separate operations: Upstream and Downstream Operations. Upstream operations involve exploration of new oil reserves, development of oil fields, constructing the well-head and crude oil production facilities. Downstream operations cover processing of crude oil in petroleum refineries to produce liquid and gaseous fuels and materials for the market. This course addresses petroleum refining to review how a variety of physical processes and chemical reactions in separate refinery units are integrated to process compliant fuels and materials.
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignment page within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 1, pp. 1-12; Chapter 3, pp. 62-65 |
---|---|
Assignments | For your information, review the most recent supply of petroleum fuels from the data given at U.S. Energy Information Administration [3] (eia.gov) and research how petroleum refining addresses the environmental concerns from the combustion of petroleum fuels in internal combustion engines. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Markets and demand for refinery products depend on the dynamics of a global economy. It is generally agreed that oil and gas will continue to be the primary energy resource in the U.S. and world economies for decades to come. Because of the projected increase in the production of oil in tight formations, the United States is expected to become an exporter of petroleum products and crude oil after decades of being an importer (Figure 1.2, EIA Annual 2013, eia.gov). Petroleum fuels will continue to dominate the transportation sector, but the following trends should be noted:
Competitive forces in the global economy lead to joint ventures and mergers and shutting down of inefficient refineries, or shutting down of processing units with low efficiency within refineries. Figure 1.3 shows the changes in the refinery capacity and number of refineries in the U.S. since 2000. The increasing refining capacity, with the decreasing number of refineries, results in the closing down of small inefficient refineries while expanding the large refineries.
Regarding the global competition, the technological advancement addresses the degrading quality of crude oils to produce cleaner and higher quality petroleum fuels. On the supply side, there is the increasing abundance of natural gas liquids (ethane, propane, n-butane, and isobutane) due to increased shale gas production in the U.S. and elsewhere. These liquids enter refineries as new feedstock in addition to crude oil supply.
Refineries need process improvements to advance their capabilities to deal with the changing crude oil base and changing environmental regulations. These improvements in refinery processes would need to create and use, for example:
Concerns for efficiency include running a refinery efficiently and producing fuels that will burn efficiently in the combustion engines, as follows:
Considering the market drivers just reviewed along the small profit margins that are often usually associated with petroleum refinery products, refineries should carefully select the crude oil feedstock and configure the refinery processes such that they produce the desirable petroleum products at the lowest cost.
In the U.S. refineries, a principal focus is on the production of gasoline because of high demand. Diesel fuel is the principal refinery product in most other parts of the world. Figure 1.4 shows a typical distribution of products from a barrel of crude oil in a U.S. refinery. Distillation process separates the crude oil into boiling point fractions. The liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) constitutes the lowest boiling point (most volatile) product from a refinery and higher boiling fractions lead to most desirable distillate liquids, such as gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, and fuel oil in the increasing order of boiling points, while asphalt is made from the residual fraction remaining after distillation.
The following animation shows a refinery flow chart indicating some of the major refinery processes and refinery products. Note that the distillation process (Fractionation Tower) separates crude oil into a number of distillate fractions that are sent as feedstocks to different processes, some of which are interconnected. It is also important to recognize that petroleum refining not only produces transportation fuels and fuels for space heating or industrial furnaces, but also produces materials needed for the operation of the combustion engines and paving the roads for vehicles to travel on.
Figure 1.5 indicates that chemical constitution and physical properties of crude oils are important parameters that guide the refinery configurations. The refining processes can be divided into four groups, as indicated. While the separation processes involve just physical phenomena, the conversion, finishing, and support processes require chemical changes, i.e., breaking chemical bonds to modify the molecular structure of the feedstocks. These changes are necessary to produce the fuels and materials in accordance with industrial/commercial specifications.
Figure 1.6 (progressive image, 25 seconds) shows a more detailed refinery block diagram to show how different processes are integrated for producing the desired fuels and materials.
Separation processes, such as distillation, dewaxing, and deasphalting make use of the differences in the physical properties of crude oil components to separate groups of hydrocarbon compounds or inorganic impurities, whereas conversion processes cause chemical changes in the hydrocarbon composition of crude oils. For example, Fluid Catalytic Cracking process breaks chemical bonds in long-chain alkanes to produce shorter chain alkanes to produce gasoline from higher boiling gas oil fractions. Finishing processes involve hydrotreating to remove heteroatoms (S, N, and metals) and product blending to produce fuels and materials with desired specifications and in compliance with environmental and government regulations. Finally, supporting processes provide the recovery of the removed heteroatoms or heteroatom compounds, production of the hydrogen necessary for conversion and hydrotreating processes, and effluent water treatment systems.
Why is diesel fuel preferred over gasoline in many countries in the world?
Crude oil contains organic compounds, heteroatom compounds (S,N,O), hydrocarbons (C, H), metals and organic (Ni, V, Fe) and inorganic (Na+, Ca++, Cl-) compounds as listed in Figure 1.7. Compounds that contain only elements of carbon and hydrogen are called hydrocarbons and constitute the largest group of organic compounds found in petroleum. There might be as many as several thousand different hydrocarbon compounds in crude oil. Hydrocarbon compounds have a general formula of CxHy, where x and y are integer numbers.
Hydrocarbons are generally divided into four groups: (1) paraffins, (2) olefins, (3) naphthenes, and (4) aromatics (Figure 1.8). Among these groups, paraffins, olefins, and naphthenes are sometimes called aliphatic compounds, as different from aromatic compounds. The lightest hydrocarbon found as a dissolved gas is methane (CH4), the main component of natural gas. Olefins are not usually found in crude oils, but produced in a number of refining processes.
Aromatic hydrocarbons are an important series of hydrocarbons found in almost every petroleum mixture from any part of the world. Aromatics are cyclic but unsaturated hydrocarbons with alternating double bonds (Figure 1.12). The simplest aromatic hydrocarbon is benzene (C6H6). The name “aromatic” refers to the fact that such hydrocarbons are commonly fragrant compounds. Although benzene has three carbon-carbon double bonds, it has a unique arrangement of electrons with resonance structures of the double bonds (aromaticity) that allow benzene to be relatively stable. However, benzene is known to be a cancer-inducing compound. For this reason, the amount of benzene allowed in petroleum products such as gasoline or fuel oil is limited by government regulations in many countries. Under standard conditions, benzene, toluene, and xylene are in liquid form whereas higher aromatics such as naphthalene occur as solids in isolation, but dissolve to form a liquid solution with simple aromatics.
What constitutes the white crystals of moth balls?
Some of the common aromatics found in crude oil and petroleum products are benzene derivatives with attached methyl, ethyl, propyl, or higher alkyl groups. This series of aromatics is called alkylbenzenes, and compounds in this homologous group of hydrocarbons have the general formula of CnH2n-6 (where n ≥ 6). Generally, an aromatic series with only one benzene ring is also called mono- aromatics or mononuclear aromatics. However, heavy petroleum fractions and residues contain unsaturated multirings with many benzene and naphthene rings attached to each other. Such aromatics that exist as solids in isolation are also called polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) or polynuclear aromatics (PNAs) (Figure 1.13). Heavy crude oils usually contain more aromatics than light crudes. It is common to have compounds with naphthenic and aromatic rings side by side (hydroaromatics, or naphthenoaromatics, Figure 1.13) especially in heavy fractions.
Figure 1.13 shows examples of PAHs, such as anthracene, phenathrene, and pyrene. The configuration of rings in PAHs strongly influences the physical and chemical properties of these compounds. For example, three-ring aromatics anthracene and phenanthrene have significantly different properties. In petroleum, PAHs exist mostly as alkyl substituted ring systems such that the substitutent alkyl groups (e.g., methyl, ethyl) replace (substitute for) the hydrogen atoms on the rings.
Normally, high-molecular-weight polyaromatics contain several heteroatoms such as sulfur, nitrogen, or oxygen, but these compounds are still called aromatic compounds because their electronic configurations maintain the aromatic character.
Sulfur is the most important heteroatom found in crude oil and refinery products petroleum, and it can be found in cyclic (e.g., thiophenes) and noncyclic compounds such as mercaptans (R-S-H) and sulfides (R-S- R′), where R and R′ are alkyl groups. Sulfur in natural gas is usually found in the form of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Figure 1.14 shows the types of sulfur compounds in crude oils. The amount of sulfur in a crude oil may vary from 0.05 to 6 % by weight. The presence of sulfur in finished petroleum products is not desirable. For example, the presence of sulfur in gasoline can promote corrosion of engine parts and produce sulfur oxides upon combustion, contributing to air pollution.
Normally, the concentration of the other heteroatom compounds (nitrogen, oxygen, and metals) in crude oils is usually lower than that of the sulfur compounds. Figure 1.15 shows the nitrogen compounds that may be found in crude oils.
Generally, in heavier crude oils the proportions of carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen compounds are higher at the expense of hydrogen content. Heavier crude oils also contain organometallic compounds of common nickel and vanadium (Figure 1.16). These compounds are highly corrosive and toxic and should be removed in the refinery. Nickel, vanadium, and copper can also severely affect the activities of catalysts and result in lower quality products. Organometallic compounds tend to concentrate in heavy, or residual fractions of crude oils.
What is the principal type of air pollution caused by the emission of sulfur oxides into the atmosphere?
Paraffins are also called alkanes and have the general formula of CnH2n+2, where n is the number of carbon atoms in a given molecule. Paraffins are divided into two groups of normal and isoparaffins. Normal paraffins or normal alkanes are simply written as n-paraffins or n-alkanes, and they are open, straight-chain saturated hydrocarbons. The second group of paraffins is called isoparaffins, which are branched-type hydrocarbons, and they begin with isobutane (also called methylpropane), which has the same closed formula as n-butane (C4H10). Compounds of different structures with the same closed formula are called isomers (Figure 1.9). For example, the open formula for n-butane, n-C4, can be shown as CH3-CH2-CH2-CH3, based on the quadrivalency of the carbon atom, and for simplicity, only the carbon-carbon bonds are drawn and most C-H bonds are omitted, as shown in Figure 1.7 and 1.8 on the previous page. Paraffins are the largest series of hydrocarbons found in petroleum and beginning with the simplest compound, methane.
Under standard conditions of temperature and pressure (STP), the first four members of the alkane series (methane, ethane, propane, and butane) are in gaseous form, and compounds starting from C5H12 (pentane) to n-heptadecane (C17H36) are liquids (constituting large fractions of hydrocarbons found in liquid fuels (e.g., gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel fuel), whereas n-octadecane (C18H38) or heavier compounds exist in isolation as wax-like solids at STP. These heavier paraffins are soluble in lighter paraffins or other hydrocarbons and can be found in diesel fuel and fuel oils. Paraffins from C1 to C40 usually appear in crude oil (heavier alkanes in liquid solution, not as solid particles) and represent up to 20% of crude by volume.
Figure 1.10 shows the statistically possible number of isomers of paraffins that increase exponentially with carbon number, starting with just one isomer for butane, reaching approximately 60,000 for C18 paraffins. Note that the branching in hydrocarbons causes significant changes in physical properties (e.g., boiling point and density, Figure 1.11) and chemical behavior (e.g., octane number, Figure 1.10) of paraffins with the same carbon number. Note in Figure 1.10 that the removal of an H atom from alkanes generates free radicals (reactive species containing unpaired electrons) that are called alkyl species (e.g., methyl formed from methane and ethyl formed from ethane by removing a hydrogen atom) also a radical with an unpaired electron. Also note the nomenclature using alkyl groups to specifically name isoalkanes (e.g., 2,2,4-trimethylpentane to designate a specific iso-octane).
Naphthenes or cycloalkanes are rings or cyclic saturated hydrocarbons with a general formula of CnH2n5H10), cyclohexane (C6H12), and their derivatives such as n-alkylcyclopentanes are normally found in crude oils.
Each week, you will be required to do assignments. The assignment for this week is:
For your information (no submission), review the most recent supply of petroleum fuels from the data given at U.S. Energy Information Administration [4] and research how petroleum refining addresses the environmental concerns from the combustion of petroleum fuels in internal combustion engines.
Take a few minutes to answer the five questions below. Use the arrow to go to the next question. When you are ready, click Check to see the solution.
Petroleum, the most important crude oil, consists of a mixture of hydrocarbon compounds including paraffinic, naphthenic, and aromatic hydrocarbons with small amounts of impurities including sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, and metals. The first process in petroleum refining operations is the separation of crude oil into its major constituents, using distillation to separate the crude oil constituents into common boiling-point fractions. Other separation processes include deasphalting to remove the heaviest fraction of crude oil, asphalt, and dewaxing to remove long-chain n-paraffins called wax.
To meet the demands for high-octane gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel fuel, heavier components of crude oils are converted to gasolines and other distillate fuels. Among the conversion processes are cracking, coking, and visbreaking that are used to break large petroleum molecules into smaller ones. Polymerization and alkylation processes are used to combine molecules smaller than those in gasoline into larger ones to make more gasoline in the refinery. Isomerization and reforming processes are applied to rearrange and reform the structure of hydrocarbons to produce higher-value gasoline components of a similar molecular size.
Finishing processes in a refinery processes stabilize and upgrade petroleum products by hydrogenation and remove undesirable elements, such as sulfur and nitrogen, by hydrotreating processes. Blending of many product streams, to come up with commercial refinery products with the required specifications, also belong to the category of finishing processes.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 1! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 2. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 1, pp. 1-12; Chapter 3, pp. 62-65 |
---|---|
Assignments | For your information, review the most recent supply of petroleum fuels from the data given at The U.S. Energy Information Administration website [3] (eia.gov) and research how petroleum refining addresses the environmental concerns from combustion of petroleum fuels in internal combustion engines. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Physical properties and composition of crude oil provide critical information for the optimum operation of a petroleum refinery. This information does not only help predict the physical behavior of crude oil in refinery units, but also gives insight into its chemical composition. Therefore, the physical properties can be related to chemical properties of crude oil and its fractions and the characteristics of the resulting refinery products. The most important properties of crude include density, viscosity, boiling point distribution, pour point, and the concentration of various contaminants.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignments page within the Lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 3, pp. 57-61, 65-70 and the course material from this site |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 1 - Submit to the Exercise 1 Assignment in the Lesson 2 Module.
|
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Density is defined as mass per unit volume of a fluid. The density of crude oil and liquid hydrocarbons is usually reported in terms of specific gravity (SG) or relative density, defined as the density of the liquid material at 60°F (15.6°C) divided by the density of liquid water at 60°F. At a reference temperature of 15.6°C, the density of liquid water is 0.999 g/cm3 (999 kg/m3), which is equivalent to 8.337 lb/gal (U.S.). Therefore, for a hydrocarbon or a petroleum fraction, the SG is defined as:
In the early years of the petroleum industry, the American Petroleum Institute (API) adopted the API gravity (°API) as a measure of the crude oil density. The API gravity is calculated from the following equation:
The API scale for gravity was adapted from the Baumé scale, developed in the late 18th century to be used in hydrometers for measuring even small differences in the specific gravity of liquids, using water as a reference material in these devices. A liquid with SG of 1 (i.e., water) has an API gravity of 10. One can note from Eq. 1 that liquid hydrocarbons with lower SGs have higher API gravities. The API of crude oils varies typically between 10 and 50, with most crude oils falling in the range of 20-45. Using API gravity, the conventional crude oils can be generally considered as light (°API>30), medium (30>°API>22), and heavy (°API<22).
Note that the relationship between °API and specific gravity is not linear. Therefore, the °API gravity of crude blends cannot be calculated by linear averaging of the component °APIs. Specific gravities of the components can be averaged, though, to determine the specific gravity of the resulting blend. In practice, averaging °APIs is usually accepted because the error involved in averaging is small.
Among the hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons have higher SG (lower °API) than paraffinic hydrocarbons with the same number of carbon atoms. For example, benzene has an SG of 0.883 (°API of 28.7), whereas n-hexane has an SG of 0.665 (°API of 81.3). Therefore, the heavy (high-density) crude oils tend to have high concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons, whereas the light (low-density) crude oils have high concentrations of paraffinic hydrocarbons.
Viscosity, commonly depicted by the symbol μ, is a physical property of a fluid that describes its tendency/resistance to flow. A high-viscosity fluid has a low tendency to flow, whereas low-viscosity fluids flow easily. Newton’s Law of Viscosity provides a physical definition of viscosity. Power requirement to transport (e.g., to pump) a fluid depends strongly on the fluid’s viscosity. Interestingly, the viscosity of liquid decreases with increasing temperature, while viscosity of gases increases with increasing temperature. Among petroleum products, viscosity constitutes a critically important characteristic of lubricating engine oils. Viscosity of liquids is usually measured in terms of kinematic viscosity, which is defined as the ratio of absolute (dynamic) viscosity to absolute density (ν = μ/ρ). Kinematic viscosity is expressed in units of centistokes (cSt), Saybolt Universal seconds (SUS), and Saybolt Furol seconds (SFS). Values of kinematic viscosity for pure liquid hydrocarbons are usually measured and reported at two reference temperatures, 38°C (100°F) and 99°C (210°F) in cSt. However, different reference temperatures, such as 40°C (104 °F), 50 °C (122 °F), and 60 °C(140 °F), are also used to report kinematic viscosities of petroleum fractions. The viscosity of crude oils can be measured using a standard method (ASTM D2983).
What are ASTM, ISO, IP?
The pour point of a crude oil, or a petroleum fraction, is the lowest temperature at which the oil will pour or flow when it is cooled, without stirring, under standard cooling conditions. Pour point represents the lowest temperature at which oil is capable of flowing under gravity. It is one of the important low-temperature characteristics of high-boiling fractions. When the temperature is less than the pour point of a petroleum product, it cannot be stored or transferred through a pipeline. Standard test procedures for measuring pour points of crude oil or petroleum fractions are described in the ASTM D97 (ISO 3016 or IP 15) and ASTM D5985 methods. The pour point of crude oils relates to their paraffin content: the higher the paraffin content, the higher the pour point.
What are Waxes?
In addition to hydrocarbons, crude oil contains hetroatom (S, N, metals) species that need to be removed if their concentrations are higher than the specified thresholds. Other impurities in crude oil include salt and sediment and water. The acidity of crude oil is also important, particularly for concerns of corrosion in pipes or other process units. Carbon residue of a crude oil indicates the tendency to generate coke on heter tubes or rector surfaces. All of these contaminants and properties of crude oils are measured using standard methods, as described in this section.
Sulfur content of crude oils is the second most important property of crude oils, next to API gravity. Sulfur content is expressed as weight percent of sulfur in oil and typically varies in the range from 0.1 to 5.0%wt. The standard methods that are used to measure the sulfur content are ASTM D129, D1552, and D2622, depending on the sulfur level. Crude oils with more than 0.5%wt sulfur need to be treated extensively during petroleum refining. Using the sulfur content, crude oils can be classified as sweet (<0.5%wt S) and sour (>0.5% %wt S). The distillation process segregates sulfur species in higher concentrations into the higher-boiling fractions and distillation residua. Removing sulfur from petroleum products is one of the most important processes in a refinery to produce fuels compliant with environmental regulations.
Nitrogen content of crude oils is also expressed as weight percent of oil. Basic nitrogen compounds are particularly undesirable in crude oil fractions, as they deactivate the acidic sites on catalysts used in conversion processes. Some nitrogen compounds are also corrosive. Crude oils with nitrogen contents greater than 0.25%wt need treatment in refineries for nitrogen removal.
Most common metals that are found in crude oil are included in organometallic compounds like nickel, vanadium iron and copper, ranging in concentration from a few ppm up to 1000 ppm by weight, depending on the source of crude oil. Similar to sulfur species, the metallic compounds tend to concentrate in the higher-boiling fraction of crude oil. Higher metal contents also require treatment during petroleum refining because of the corrosion activity of some metals and their tendency to accumulate on catalyst surfaces, thus deactivating the catalysts in a number of refinery processes. Metal content can be measured using a standard EPA Method 3040.
Acidity of crude oil is measured by titration with potassium hydroxide (KOH), using the standard method ASTM D664. The measured acidity is expressed as the Total Acid Number (TAN) that is equivalent to milligrams of KOH required to neutralize 1 gram of oil. This number is particularly important to control corrosion in the distillation columns through selection of corrosion-resistant alloys for surfaces that come into contact with oil.
Carbon residue (as % wt of crude oil, or crude oil fraction) is determined as the weight of solid residue remaining after heating crude oil to coking temperatures (700-800°C). Two standard tests with slightly different procedures are used to measure carbon residue: ASTM D524 Ramsbottom Carbon Residue (RCR) and ASTM D189 Conradson Carbon Residue (CCR). Carbon residue relates to asphalt (or asphaltenes) content of oil and indicates the tendency of fouling in heater tubes and catalyst deactivation. The higher the carbon residue, the higher is the coking (fouling) propensity of crude oil.
The standard method ASTM D4007 is used to measure the amount of suspended inorganic solid particles and water (BS&W) in crude oils. These contaminants are mixed with the oil during production, and high concentration of BS&W causes operational problems in a refinery.
Salt content of crude oils can be measured using the standard method ASTM D3230 and reported as lb NaCl/1000 bbl. Desalting (removing the salt) is necessary when NaCl content is greater than 10 lbs/1000 bbl. Such high salt contents lead to corrosion in distillation towers and other equipment.
The boiling point of a pure compound in the liquid state is defined as the temperature at which the vapor pressure of the compound equals the atmospheric pressure or 1 atm. The boiling point of pure hydrocarbons depends on carbon number, molecular size, and the type of hydrocarbons (aliphatic, naphthenic, or aromatic) as discussed in Lesson 1. Figure 2.1 shows the boiling points of n-alkanes as a function of carbon number.
Complex mixtures such as crude oil, or petroleum products with thousands of different compounds, boil over a temperature range as opposed to having a single point for a pure compound. The boiling range covers a temperature interval from the initial boiling point (IBP), defined as the temperature at which the first drop of distillation product is obtained, to a final boiling point, or endpoint (EP) when the highest-boiling compounds evaporate. The boiling range for crude oil may exceed 1000 °F.
The ASTM D86 and D1160 standards describe a simple distillation method for measuring the boiling point distribution of crude oil and petroleum products. Using ASTM, D86 boiling points are measured at 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90 vol% distilled. The points are also frequently reported at 0%, 5%, and 95% distilled. ASTM D1160 is carried out at reduced pressure to distill the high-boiling components of crude oil. As an alternative method, distillation data can be obtained by gas chromatography (GC), in which boiling points are reported versus the weight percent of the sample vaporized. This test method described in ASTM D2887 is called simulated distillation (SimDis).
Average boiling points are useful in predicting physical properties and for characterization of complex hydrocarbon mixtures. The key here is to represent a mixture of compounds with a range of boiling points by a single characteristic boiling point. Since this is a formidable task, there are five different “average boiling points” that are used in different correlations. They are:
1, 2, and 3 can be defined for a mixture of n components as:
where ABP is is expressed as VABP, MABP, or WABP and xi is the corresponding volume, mole, or weight fraction of component i, and Tbi is the normal boiling point of component i. Cubic average boiling point (CABP) and Mean Average Boling Points (MeABP) can be calculated as follows.
For petroleum streams, volume, weight, or mole fractions of the components are not usually known. In this case, VABP is calculated from standard distillation (ASTM D86 Method) data, and empirical relationships (charts, or equations) are used to calculate the other average boiling points.
Here is the procedure:
Equation 1 (Ts are ASTM D86 temperatures for 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90% volume distilled, respectively):
Along with VABP, the slope of the ASTM D86, SL, is used for converting VABP to other average boiling points.
Equation 2:
The following empirical equations can, then, be used to obtain the temperature difference (ΔT) between VABP and other average boiling points (ABP) [2] :
Equation 3:
Equation 4:
Equation 5:
Equation 6:
and
Equation 7:
The temperature unit used for VABP, SL, and ΔT in these correlations is Kelvin.
The following script can be used to calculate VABP, MeABP by entering the distillation temperatures in the table.
You may also use the charts in Figure 4.1a and Figure 4.1b (p. 39) of your textbook [3] to obtain MeABP and MABP, respectively, from VABP. Note that the slope of the distillation curve used in those charts refers to True Boiling Point (TBP) distillation (not to ASTM distillation), and it is calculated as (T70% -T10%)/60.
[3] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 4, p.39.
Crude oil assay consists of a compilation of data on properties and composition of crude oils. The assay provides critical information on the suitability of crude oil for a particular refinery and estimating the desired product yields and quality. It also indicates how extensively a given crude oil should be treated in a refinery to produce fuels that are in compliance with environmental regulations. A typical crude assay should include the following major specifications:
Since the early days of the petroleum industry, some physical properties of crude oil were used to define characterization factors for classification of crude oil with respect to hydrocarbon types [4] as shown in Equation 8.
where: Tb = volume, or mean average normal boiling point in R (degree Rankine) and SG = specific gravity at 15.6°C (60°F). To calculate KUOP or KW, volume average boiling point (VABP) or mean average boiling point is used, respectively. Depending on the value of the Watson characterization factor, crude oils are classified as paraffinic (Kw = 11-12.9), naphthenic (Kw =10-11), or aromatic (Kw <10).
Another parameter defined in the early years of petroleum characterization is the viscosity gravity constant (VGC). This parameter depends on viscosity expressed in Saybolt Universal Seconds (SUS) and specific gravity. According to a standard method (ASTM D2501), VGC can be calculated at a reference temperature of 100°F as follows in Equation 9:
where V(100°F) is the viscosity in SUS and SG is the specific gravity at 15.6°C (60°F). VGC varies between 0.74 to 0.75 for paraffinic, 0.89 and 0,94 for naphthenic, and 0.95 and 1.13 for aromatic hydrocarbons.
The U.S. Bureau of Mines Correlation Index (BMCI) or (CI) is useful for characterization of crude oil fractions. CI is defined in terms of Mean Average Boiling Point (Tb) and specific gravity (SG) at 60°F as shown in Equation 10:
According to this CI scale, all n-paraffins have a CI value of 0, while cyclohexane (the simplest naphthene), has a CI value of 50, and benzene has a CI value of 100. Using the CI values, crude oils can be classified as follows:
paraffinic | CI<29.8 |
---|---|
naphthenic | CI<57.0 |
aromatic | CI>75.0 |
[4] K. M. Watson, E. F. Nelson , George B. Murphy, “Characterization of Petroleum Fractions,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 1935, 27 (12), pp 1460–1464
Despite a wide variety of crude oil found in different parts of the earth, the elemental composition of most crude oils changes in narrow ranges, as shown in Table 2.2.
Element | % Wt |
---|---|
C | 84-86% |
H | 11-14% |
S | 0-6% |
N | 0-1% |
O | 0-2% |
With such narrow ranges of change in elemental contents, elemental composition does not have much utility for classification of crude oil. Instead, variations in hydrocarbon composition (paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics) are used to classify crude oils, using a ternary diagram, shown in Figure 2.2. Each apex of the triangle represents 100 percent weight of the corresponding compounds, and 0% of this particular type of hydrocarbons on the side of the triangle across from the apex. For example, the side at the bottom of the triangle (across from the apex of 100% aromatics) represents binary mixtures of paraffins and naphthenes.
If you need to refresh your memory on reading ternary diagrams, you may check "Reading a Ternary Diagram [11]", or consult other sources. The list below shows the six classes of crude oil that are defined using a ternary diagram. These classes are shown as areas on the ternary diagram for paraffins, below. It is generally accepted that Class 1 (rich in paraffins) represents the most desirable type of crude oil because refining these crudes would readily lead to high yields of light and middle distillates that constitute the fuels such as gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel which are in high demand. Extensive refining would be required to produce high yields of distillate fuels from aromatic crudes (e.g., Class 4-6). Class 1 crudes tend to have high °API and low sulfur contents and tend to be more expensive than the other types of crude oils.
Take a few minutes to answer the questions below. When you are ready, Click Check to see the solutions.
Each week, you will have a number of assignments. This week's assignments are listed below. All assignments are submitted in Canvas. For due dates, please check your syllabus.
Quiz 1 is located in the Quizzes folder in Canvas. Quiz 1 will cover material in Lessons 1 and 2.
Exercise 1 is provided in Canvas module Lesson 2 as a downloadable file. Submit your answers as a file in PDF format the Exercise 1 assignment in the Lesson 2 Module. For all the exerciase in this course, please make sure that you clearly indicate all the steps that you use to solve the problems and submit your own work.
Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable.
Selected properties of crude oil provide information on its quality and the conditions for optimum operation of a petroleum refinery for processing the crude oil to produce the desired fuels. Readily measurable physical properties of crude oil (such as density, boiling point, and viscosity) not only help predict the physical behavior of crude oil during refining but also give insight into the chemical composition of the oil. Therefore, physical properties can be used in developing characterization factors that relate to the chemical behavior of crude oil and the characteristics of the resulting refinery products. In addition to using characterization factors, crude oils are classified using ternary diagrams reflecting the hydrocarbon composition in terms of paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 2! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 3. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 3, pp. 57-61, 65-70 and the course material from this site |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 1 - Submit to the Exercise 1 Assignment in the Lesson 2 Module.
|
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion Forum (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Selected properties of crude oil provide information on its quality and the conditions for the optimum operation of a petroleum refinery for processing the crude oil to produce the desired fuels. Readily measurable physical properties of crude oil (such as density, boiling point, and viscosity) not only help in predicting the physical behavior of crude oil during refinery but also give insight into the chemical composition of the oil. Therefore, physical properties can be used in developing characterization factors that relate to the chemical behavior of crude oil and the characteristics of the resulting refinery products. In addition to using characterization factors, crude oils are classified using ternary diagrams reflecting the hydrocarbon composition in terms of paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics.
As introduced in Lesson 1, petroleum refining integrates four types of processes: separation, conversion, finishing, and supporting processes. This lesson involves a quick walk through a simple refinery in the U.S. to see what happens to a barrel of crude oil, and to provide more detail on how different processes are sequenced for optimum operation. The simple animation below shows a simplified diagram of processing network to maximize gasoline yield and produce the other distillate fuels (jet fuel, diesel fuel, and fuel oil) in high yield.
The first sequence of processes in a refinery makes use of physical separation to wash the salt out and to fractionate the desalted crude into different boiling ranges in a distillation column. Following the distillation, these fractions are subjected to further separation processes, such as those in Light Ends Unit (LEU) dewaxing and deasphalting units; to finishing processes, such as hydrotreatment; and to conversion processes, such as catalytic cracking, hydrocracking, visbreaking, and delayed coking. As shown in the animation below, the final products from these processes include Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), lubricating oil base stock, asphalt, jet fuel and diesel fuel, gasoline, fuel oil, and petroleum coke. Some fractions from LEU are sent to finishing processes (blending and hydrotreatment) and further to a conversion process (reforming) to produce additional gasoline. Light products from catalytic cracking are subjected to further conversion in the alkylation process to produce more gasoline. Finally, supporting processes, hydrogen production and sulfur recovery, help remove the major heteroatom contaminant, sulfur, from the petroleum fuels through hydrotreatment [1].
This refinery scheme is typical in U.S. refineries where the premium product is gasoline, as one could tell from the number of processes that lead to gasoline as the major product. The gasoline streams from different processes are blended in sophisticated linear and non-linear programming schemes to produce the three grades of gasoline sold in the U.S., regular, intermediate, and premium grades defined in reference to octane number. Elsewhere in the world, there is more emphasis on producing diesel fuel rather than gasoline, since the transportation systems are not as heavily dependent on gasoline-powered passenger vehicles. Diesel fuel is preferred for mass transport options (e.g., buses and trains), as diesel engines (with compression-ignition) can deliver more power than spark-ignition gasoline engines.
In the following sections, each major process group in a refinery network will be introduced in sequence. We will discuss how they fit in the “industrial ecology” of petroleum refining for the overall economic goal of maximizing profit in the prevailing markets for crude oil and the refined petroleum products. The video below presents a flow diagram integrating the four types of processes in a petroleum refinery.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignments page within this lesson.
Readings: | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, & Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 1, pp. 32-36; Chapter 2, pp. 41-55 and the course material from this site |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 2: Using ternary classification to characterize crude oil blends |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Although distillation is usually known as the first process in petroleum refineries, in many cases, desalting should take place before distillation (Figure 3.1). Salt dissolved in water (brine) enters the crude stream as a contaminant during the production or transportation of oil to refineries. If salt is not removed from crude oil, serious damage can result, especially in the heater tubes, due to corrosion caused by the presence of Cl. Salt in crude oil also causes reduction in heat transfer rates in heat exchangers and furnaces.
The three stages of desalting are:
Desalting can be performed in a single-stage or two-stage units. The amount of water wash and the temperature of the mixing process depends mainly on the crude API gravity [2].
Distillation separates hydrocarbon compounds into distillate fractions based on their boiling points or volatility. More volatile compounds (with low boiling points) tend to vaporize more readily than heavy compounds, and this forms the basis of separation through distillation. In a distillation column, light components are removed from the top of the column, and the heavier part of the mixture appears in the bottom. For a crude that is a mixture of thousands of hydrocarbons, some very light compounds such as ethane and propane only appear in the top product, while extremely heavy and non-volatile compounds such as asphalts only appear in the bottom. Figure 2 shows a simple diagram of atmospheric and vacuum distillation units and the fractional separation of the crude oil into different boiling fractions with the indicated boiling ranges. The lightest compounds found in crude oil come out from the top of the distillation column (referred to as overhead distillate, or full-range naphtha) and are sent to the Light Ends Unit (LEU) for further separation into LPG and naphtha, as discussed later. The side streams separated in the atmospheric distillation column give fractions that include the “straight-run” products called kerosene, and light and heavy gas oils. The residue from the atmospheric distillation column generates two side streams, light and heavy vacuum gas oils, and vacuum residue from the bottom. All of these distillation products are subjected to subsequent processing to produce light and middle distillate fuels and non-fuel products, as described in the following sections, starting with LEU.
As shown in Figure 3.2, the Light Ends Unit consists of a sequence of distillation processes to separate the overhead distillate product from the atmospheric distillation column into five streams consisting of methane and ethane (C2 and lighter), to propane (C3), butane (C4), light naphtha, and heavy naphtha. The fraction C2 and lighter is used as fuel gas in the refinery to provide heat or generate steam. Propane and butane are sold as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) after removing H2S. Light naphtha fraction that consists of C5 and C6 paraffins (pentane and hexane) is sent to the gasoline blending pool as straight-run gasoline, while the heavy naphtha fraction (rich in cycloalkanes, or naphthenes) is sent to a catalytic reforming process to produce gasoline with a high octane number.
Catalytic reforming converts low-octane straight run naphtha fractions (particularly heavy naphtha that is rich in naphthenes) into a high-octane, low-sulfur reformate, which is a major blending product for gasoline (Figure 3.3). The most valuable byproduct from catalytic reforming is hydrogen, which is needed in refineries with increasing demand for hydrotreating and hydrocracking processes. Most reforming catalysts contain platinum supported on alumina, and some may contain additional metals such as rhenium and tin in bi-, or tri-metallic catalyst formulations. Early reforming processes were called platforming in reference to reforming with a platinum catalyst. In most cases for catalytic reforming, the naphtha feedstock needs to be hydrotreated before reforming, to protect the platinum catalyst from poisoning by sulfur or nitrogen species. The principal reactions in catalytic reforming include dehydrogenation of naphthenes to aromatics (with significant quantity of hydrogen as byproduct) and cracking/isomerization of n-paraffins into i-paraffins. The principal product from catalytic reforming is called reformate, consisting of C4 to C10 hydrocarbons. Reformate has a high octane number because of high concentration of aromatic compounds (benzene, toluene, and xylene) produced from naphthenes. With the more stringent requirements on benzene and total aromatics limit in US and Europe (less than 1% benzene, 15% total aromatics), the amount of reformate that can be used in gasoline blending has been limited, but the function of catalytic reforming as the only internal source of hydrogen continues to be important for refineries.
As seen with the catalytic reforming in the previous section, catalytic hydrotreatment can be used as a pretreatment step to protect catalysts from crude oil contaminants such as heteroatom (S, N, O) compounds, as well as metals (mainly Ni, V). Hydrotreatment is also used as a major finishing process in a petroleum refinery. Shifting to the side stream products from the distillation column, kerosene and light gas oil fractions can be hydrotreated to remove the heteroatoms to produce the final products of jet fuel, and diesel fuel, as shown in Figure 3.4. Particularly strict sulfur limits are imposed on diesel fuels so that the particulate emissions from diesel engines can be reduced. In the U.S., the government regulations [3] require that highway and non-road locomotive and marine (NRLM) use diesel fuel that meets a maximum specification of 15 parts per million (ppm) sulfur by 2014, with a full compliance for highway use and non-road diesel fuel since December 2010. Note in Figure 5 that typical catalysts used for hydrotreating are Co and Mo compounds supported on alumina (Al2O3). Jet fuel consists of C10 to C15 hydrocarbons, and diesel fuel consists of C15 to C20 hydrocarbons. Analogous to octane number for gasoline, a performance parameter for diesel fuel is cetane number (n-C16H34, n-hexadecane) that measures, in contrast to octane number, the tendency (not resistance) of diesel fuel to ignite upon compression with air. As a side note, light gas oil fraction is not typically used in the U.S. for producing diesel fuel, but sent to catalytic cracking to make gasoline.
Moving down to the side streams of the distillation column, heavy gas oil constitutes the next fraction in line. Some generic conversion processes for the heavy distillates, such as heavy gas oil (consisting of C20 to C25 hydrocarbons), are shown in Figure 3.5. These processes, aimed at reducing the molecular size or the boiling point of gas oil compounds, involve thermal cracking or catalytic cracking. A mild thermal cracking process, called visbreaking, is applied to reduce the viscosity of the feedstock, and it is more frequently applied to residual fractions, such as vacuum distillation residue. A more severe thermal cracking of heavy gas oil can be used to produce LPG and ethylene and light and middle distillates from heavy gas oil. A highly aromatic byproduct from thermal cracking is called ethylene tar. Ethylene is an important petrochemical feedstock, while ethylene tar can be used as feedstock to produce carbon blacks. Catalytic cracking is more frequently used for conversion of heavy gas oil to gasoline.
A particular process of catalytic cracking, Fluid Catalytic Cracking, is almost exclusively used worldwide in heavy gas oil and light vacuum gas oil conversion. This process produces high octane gasoline primarily, with important byproducts, including LPG, light olefins and i-alkanes, light cycle oil (LCO), heavy cycle oil (HCO), and clarified slurry oil (also called decant oil), as shown in Figure 3.6. LCO is used in the U.S. to produce diesel oil by hydrocracking, and decant oil can be used as fuel oil, feedstock for carbon black manufacturing, and to produce a special type of petroleum coke called needle coke. Needle coke has a microstructure that makes it a good precursor to graphite electrodes that are used in electric-arc furnaces to recycle scrap iron and steel. The manufacturing of graphite electrodes, using a byproduct from FCC used to produce gasoline, is considered a principal interface between petroleum refining and the iron and steel industry.
Moving to the vacuum distillation column, the vacuum distillates, light vacuum gas oil (LVGO) and heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) can be processed by some advanced FCC processes. However, hydrocracking is more frequently used to convert LVGO and HVGO into light and middle distillates, using particular catalysts and hydrogen. Similar to LCO, the LVGO and HVGO fractions from vacuum distillation tend to be highly aromatic. Catalytic hydrocracking combines hydrogenation and cracking to handle feedstocks that are heavier than those that can be processed by FCC, because of excessive coke deposition on the catalyst in the absence of hydrogen. Middle distillates (e.g., kerosene and diesel fuel) are the principal products of hydrocracking. In addition to light and middle distillates, hydrocracking also produces light distillates and LPG, as shown in Figure 3.7.
HVGO can also be used as a feedstock to produce lubricating oil base stock, through a sequence of solvent extraction processes to remove aromatic hydrocarbons by furfural extraction, and to remove long-chain paraffins by dewaxing (Figure 3.8).
The heaviest and the most contaminated component of crude oil is the vacuum distillation residue (VDR), also referred to as the bottom-of-the-barrel. There are multiple processing paths to upgrade VDR into usable products. One process is called deasphalting, which removes the heaviest fraction of VDR as asphalt that is used mainly to pave roadways. The lighter fraction obtained in the deasphalting process, deasphalted oil (DAO), can be used as fuel oil after hydrotreatment (Figure 3.9).
Thermal processes, such as visbreaking and coking, also provide options for upgrading VDR, which is normally a solid at ambient temperature. As shown in Figure 3.10, the visbreaking operation involves mild thermal cracking, with the primary purpose of producing a relatively low grade fuel oil (with a much lower pour point than VDR) and byproducts such as middle and light (naphtha) distillates and LPG. The yield of these byproducts would normally not exceed 10%wt of VDR. As a general rule in refinery conversion processes, producing a lighter product with a higher H/C ratio (e.g., fuel oil, middle distillates, LPG) from a feedstock (e.g., VDR) would require the simultaneous formation of a heavier product (e.g., coke) with a lower H/C ratio than the feedstock. Clearly, this compensation is dictated by the hydrogen balance, or hydrogen distribution among the products. With no external hydrogen entering the conversion unit (as it would in hydrogenation, or hydrocracking reactions), making a product(s) with a higher H/C ratio than that of the feed would require making other product(s) with a lower H/C ratio than that in the feedstock. In the case of visbreaking, what enables the production of lighter (or lower viscosity) fuel oil and other products from VDR is the formation of small quantities of coke with an extremely low H/C ratio. Hence, the term disproportination describes this unequal distribution of C or H in the conversion products, or losing (rejecting) C in the coke that accumulates on reactor tubes and is periodically burned out to clean the reactor tubes.
As different from visbreaking, coking involves severe thermal cracking with intentional production of coke with a low H/C, so that lighter fuels can be obtained from VDR (by disproportionation), as can also be seen in Figure 3.10. The product coke obtained from VDR with relatively low heteroatom concepts, termed sponge coke, can be used in manufacturing carbon anodes that are used in electrolysis of alumina (Al2O3) to produce aluminum metal. This is another important interface between petroleum refining and metals industries, similar to the coke produced from decant oil used for making needle coke for manufacturing graphite electrodes to operate electric-arc furnaces, as mentioned before.
It should be clear from this quick tour of a refinery, that the most valuable products from a refinery include light distillates (gasoline) and middle distillates (jet fuel and diesel). These products are mostly paraffinic and contain relatively short paraffin chains, or small molecules, or, in other words, high H/C ratios. In this context, one could summarize the overall goal of petroleum refining as managing the H/C ratio of the products for the optimum distribution of hydrogen into products to maximize profits. Controlling the H/C ratio of the products would require either lowering the C content of the products (i.e., carbon rejection), or increasing the H content (i.e., hydrogen addition). The animation below depicts these two major paths for upgrading heavy oil (or crude oil) with some examples for each path. The processes, coking, solvent extraction (e.g., deasphalting), visbreaking, and catalytic cracking reject carbon in the coke (carbonaceous) product so that lighter products (with high H/C) ratios can be obtained in these processes. Carbon in the coke, or in the heavier product, is considered to have been rejected (and potentially lost) since the carbonaceous byproducts have much lower value in comparison to those of the lighter products. In contrast, hydrogen addition, as in the processes of hydrogenation and hydrocracking, enables the conversion of all the carbon present in heavy oil (or crude oil) to high value products without rejecting, or sacrificing, any. One might ask, then, why would any refinery carry out any carbon rejection process instead of hydrogen addition? A short answer to this question involves basic refinery economics; the hydrogen addition processes cost much more than carbon rejection processes, because producing hydrogen and the catalysts used in hydrogen addition processes are very expensive.
Please take a few minutes to answer the following questions. When you are happy with your responses, click Check below.
Each week, you will have a number of assignments. This week's assignments are listed below with instructions on what to do. For due dates, please check your Syllabus.
Exercise 2 is provided as a downloadable file in Canvas module Lesson 3. Please submit answers as a pdf to the Exercise 2 assignment in the Lesson 3 Module.
Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable.
Naphthenes % | Aromatics % | |
---|---|---|
Crude A | 30 | 65 |
Crude B | 10 | 35 |
aromatics | naphthenes | paraffins | |
---|---|---|---|
Crude A | 70%wt | 10%wt | 20%wt |
Crude B | 25%wt | 60%wt | 15%wt |
Crude C | 15%wt | 25%wt | 60%wt |
Once you have a solution to the exercises, you will submit your answers as a PDF by uploading your file to be graded. The MS Word, or Excel files should be saved as a PDF before submitting the exercise. Please Note: Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable.
A refinery has access to two different crude oil stocks, A and B with the following compositions:
Naphthenes % | Aromatics % | |
---|---|---|
Crude A | 30 | 65 |
Crude B | 10 | 35 |
The compositions of three crude oils available to a refinery are as follows:
Crude A: 60%wt paraffins, 20%wt naphthenes
Crude B: 50%wt aromatics, 30%wt paraffins
Crude C: 10%wt paraffins, 20%wt naphthenes
The refiners would like to maintain a weight ratio of 1/1, Crude A/Crude C in a ternary blend of the oils A, B, and C. What would be the minimum concentration of Crude B (% wt) in a ternary blend that could be classified as naphthenic oil?
aromatics | naphthenes | paraffins | |
---|---|---|---|
Crude A | 70%wt | 10%wt | 20%wt |
Crude B | 25%wt | 60%wt | 15%wt |
Crude C | 15%wt | 25%wt | 60%wt |
Set A+B+C = 100 and A=C
Naphtene balance:
0.1(100-B)/2 + 0.6B + 0.25(100-B)/2 > 40
0.42B >22.5
B > 54 (approximately)
B>54, Therefore, B must be greater than 54% to maintain a naphthenic crude blend.
A refinery has access to two different crude oil stocks, A and B with the following compositions:
Naphthenes % | Aromatics % | |
---|---|---|
Crude A | 10 | 60 |
Crude B | 60 | 10 |
You may solve the problem graphically using a ternary diagram, as described below.
The compositions of three crude oils available to a refinery are as follows:
Crude A: 60%wt paraffins, 20%wt naphthenes
Crude B: 50%wt aromatics, 30%wt paraffins
Crude C: 10%wt paraffins, 20%wt naphthenes
The refiners would like to maintain a weight ratio of 1/1, Crude B/Crude C in a ternary blend of the oils A, B, and C. What would be the minimum concentration of Crude A (% wt) in a ternary blend that could be classified as paraffinic oil?
aromatics | naphthenes | paraffins | |
---|---|---|---|
Crude A | 20%wt | 20%wt | 60%wt |
Crude B | 50%wt | 20%wt | 30%wt |
Crude C | 70%wt | 20%wt | 10%wt |
Set A+B+C = 100g and B=C
Paraffin balance:
0.60A + 0.3(100-A)/2 + 0.1(100-A)/2 > 40
1.2A + 30 - 0 .3A + 10 - 0.1A >80
.8A > 40
A>50, Therefore, A must be greater than 50% to maintain a paraffinic crude blend.
Petroleum refining may be considered as the most sophisticated scheme of integrated physical and chemical processes to meet the market demand for a number of fuels and materials in the economy. In addition to satisfying the performance specifications required by combustion engines, the composition of the produced fuels, such as gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel fuel, should be in compliance with environmental regulations. Considering that crude oil is a natural material that displays a wide range of variability in hydrocarbon composition and the distribution of heteroatom species, it is vital to practice an optimum sequence of the four types of processes that make up petroleum refining: separation, conversion, finishing, and support. These processes are integrated as an example of industrial ecology, such that every drop of crude oil ends up as a marketable product, including the contaminants such as sulfur. The U.S. refineries are configured to maximize the yield of gasoline (a light distillate) as the major product, along with jet fuel and diesel fuel (middle distillates). A number of processes produce different gasoline streams that are blended in sophisticated linear and non-linear programming schemes to produce the three grades of gasoline sold in the U.S. for profit. A quick walk through the network of refinery processes reveals the two general strategies that are in place to create the most value in the operation: carbon rejection and hydrogen addition. The balance between these two strategies hangs in the refinery economics and the markets for crude oil and refined petroleum products.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 3! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 4. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found within this lesson.
Readings: | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 1, pp. 32-36; Chapter 2, pp. 41-55 and the course material from this site |
---|---|
Assignments: | Submit Exercise 2 as a PDF, or Excel file to the Exercise 2 assignment in the Lesson 3 Module. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
As introduced in Lesson 3, distillation is a key separation process that fractionates crude oil into a number of streams with specific boiling point ranges, or distillation cuts. Removing salt from crude oil usually precedes the distillation process to protect the downstream units from corrosion caused by Cl¯. Desalting process could also remove metals (e.g., Fe, Ni, V) and other inorganic solids and sediments that may deactivate catalysts used in conversion and finishing units. Depending on the specific gravity and the amount of salt present in a crude oil, refineries conduct from one up to three stages of desalting [1]. Heavy and crudes may require three stages of desalting, using processes such as gravity settling, electrostatic coalescence, and packed column separation [2]. Figure 4.1 shows a simple desalting process that uses gravity settling to separate brine (NaCl +H2O) from crude oil after diluting the crude with water and adding de-emulsifiers (chemical additives) to facilitate phase separation.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found on the Assignments page within this lesson.
Reading | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 4 (Crude Distillation) |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 3: Appraisal of the degree of separation between distillation fractions Quiz 2: Will cover the material in Lessons 3-4. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Distillation of crude oil is carried out in two units, first in an Atmospheric Distillation Unit (also known as Crude Distillation Unit, CDU), with further processing of the residue from atmospheric distillation in the Vacuum Distillation Unit (VDU), as illustrated in Figure 4.2. For sake of simplicity, Figure 4.2 does not include the network of heat exchangers and pump around loops to pre-heat the desalted crude before it is fed into the fired furnace. In the furnace, the crude is heated to the desired temperatures (700-750° F) such that all the distillate fraction and roughly 10-20% of the bottom product are evaporated, depending on the volatility of crude oil. The two-phase mixture is then introduced into the CDU flash zone for separation of vapor and liquid streams, where the vapor fraction rises toward the top of the column and the liquid fraction is subjected to stripping with steam to recover the low-boiling distillate components dissolved in heavier liquid before sending the bottom product (i.e., atmospheric distillation residue) to the vacuum distillation unit.
A temperature gradient is established in the column by removing heat from the overhead vapor. The column condenses the naphtha fraction and sends a portion of the liquid naphtha, as reflux, to the column to achieve a good separation of the distillate products drawn from the side of the distillation column, such as kerosene, LGO, and HGO, as seen in the diagram. Steam strippers on the side of the column also provide reflux to the main column to help with clean separation of the distillate products. Additional reflux is provided to the main column by pump around loops associated with heat exchangers (see Figure 4.3, below, and Figure 4.8 in the textbook) for preheating the crude. Counter-current flow of vapor and liquid streams through the contact stages (e.g., trays) in the main column, enabling good separation of the distillate fractions. The temperature at the bottom of CDU is limited to 700-750° F to prevent cracking – breaking of the chemical bonds between carbon atoms in the aliphatic hydrocarbons constituting the crude oil. Cracking would cause coking (accumulation of carbonaceous solids) on the metal surfaces in the column and interferes with fractionation in distillation. Vacuum distillation is necessary to fractionate the heavy distillates because further increase in temperature would cause thermal cracking of the feed components. In HYSYS Project 1 assignment, you will learn how to introduce crude assay data to a distillation simulator and calculate the yields of naphtha, kerosene, diesel, atmospheric gas oil, and residue for different crudes.
As shown in Figure 4.4, below (and in Figure 4.10 in the textbook), the atmospheric residue is reheated in a fired furnace to 730-850° F before introduction into the vacuum distillation unit (VDU). The furnace outlet temperature is selected depending on the thermal reactivity (or coking propensity of crude oil, as will be discussed further) and the desired level of separation in the column. Steam ejectors, or, more recently, vacuum pumps, are used to create a vacuum for evaporation of the light vacuum gas oil and heavy vacuum gas oil fractions. The temperature and pressure in VDU also depend on whether steam is introduced, or the separation is carried out without the steam addition in “dry” towers, varying between 10 to 30 mmHg at the bottom of the tower. Lower pressures and higher temperatures are used in dry towers. To minimize the pressure difference between the bottom and top of the column, some special packing materials are used (see, for example, Figure 4.5) instead of trays for providing contact between liquid and vapor streams to improve fractionation.
The heavy distillates (light vacuum gas oil and heavy vacuum gas oil) separated in VDU are further processed in downstream separation and conversion units to produce lubricating oil base stocks, or as feedstock for hydrocracking to produce light and middle distillates. The residue from vacuum distillation (VDR) can be upgraded into marketable products and fuels using processes such as visbreaking, deasphalting, and coking, as will be discussed in later sections.
Selecting the right temperature in the vacuum distillation column is critical to control the risk of coking in the column. The Watson Characterization Factor (Kw) [13] may be used to estimate the upper temperature limit for vacuum distillation to avoid coking. Figure 4.6 shows an empirical correlation between Kw and the temperatures above which significant thermal decomposition could take place. This region is labeled as the decomposition zone in Figure 4.6. Because of the complex variability in crude oil composition as it relates to coking propensity, one could draw a band of temperatures below which coking risk is negligible, and the area within the band represents uncertainty in terms of the probability of coking. To be on the safe side, the temperature in the column should be lower than the lower temperature line of the band. Figure 4.6 also shows that crudes with high Kw (paraffinic) should be heated to lower temperatures in the column than crudes with lower Kw (less paraffinic). Hydrocarbon composition is closely related to thermal reactivity, since paraffins could be more readily cracked than naphthenes, whereas aromatic compounds are the most stable hydrocarbons. To sum up, vacuum distillation temperatures should be selected with particular care for paraffinic crudes because of the relative ease of cracking of paraffins that leads to the formation of coke on surfaces.
Severe cases of coking can plug the flow paths in the distillation column and require shutting down the unit. Shutting down a distillation unit would be catastrophic, as it would require shutting down the whole refinery that must run around the clock except for the scheduled maintenance period.
Question 1: Why would shutting down a refinery be a catastrophic event?
Three different distillation methods are commonly used to generate laboratory data on crude oil:
The degree of separation between the distillation fractions obtained in these methods decreases significantly as one moves down the list from TBP through ASTM to EFV. Each method and the associated distillation data have different applications in the refinery practice.
This method, described in Figure 4.7a and b, uses a batch distillation operation that incorporates more than 100 theoretical plates and a high reflux ratio (R/P) of 100, as described in Figure 4.7a. This is an idealized method to achieve the best possible separation in distillation, made possible by a large number of theoretical plates (stages) for liquid vapor contact in the column and an extremely high reflux ratio. As an example, consider distillation of a binary mixture of compounds A (70% by volume) and B (30% by volume), with boiling points Ta and Tb, respectively. Figure 4.7b illustrates the distillation curve that would be obtained if this mixture were distilled using the TBP method, with perfect separation of A and B as pure compounds. Because of the TBP distillation conditions, first the lower boiling component A is distilled off without any contamination with B, and following the complete vaporization of A, B is distilled off as a pure compound. Note that because a large number of plates and a high reflux ratio in the column, temperature remains constant during evaporation of A until all of this compound is boiled off, as would be seen in the distillation of a pure compound.
ASTM distillation also uses a batch operation, but in contrast to TBP, it operates without the presence of a contact plate and a reflux ratio (R/P, or RR) of zero, as shown in Figure 4.8a. There may be a slight unintentional reflux because of the condensation of the vapor on the tube that connects the flask to the condenser.
Equilibrium flash vaporization involves heating a flowing feed and the separation of the liquid and vapor in a flash drum. A distillation curve may be obtained by conducting this distillation at varying heater outlet temperatures. Figure 4.9 shows the diagram of an EFV set up and compares the distillation curves from the three methods, TBP, ASTM, and EFV. From the comparison of the curves and the relationship between IBP and EP obtained in each case, one concludes that EFV gives the lowest degree of separation between A and B, even lower than that given by the ASTM distillation.
The TBP, ASTM, and EFV distillation methods achieve different levels of separation for a given sample, as related to the different techniques used in these analyses. Figure 4.10 shows TBP, ASTM, and EFV curves for a middle distillate fraction crude oil, showing significant differences in IBP and EP of the three curves [6]. Note that three curves converge near 50% volume distilled. TBP distillation achieves a higher degree of separation than ASTM and ASTM achieves better separation than EFV, as can be seen in the curves in Figure 4.10. Empirical correlations have been developed to convert one set of distillation data to another [7].
Each distillation method discussed in this section has an application in petroleum refining. TBP distillation is used to characterize crude oils and constitute a significant component of crude essay. ASTM methods are usually used for refinery products and property calculations and correlations for distillate fractions. EFV provides useful data for flashing operations in the refinery.
There are no standard methods for TBP distillation, but ASTM D-2892 method is used to approximate the TBP distillation. This method is also referred to as 15-5 distillation, because of 15 theoretical plates and a reflux ratio of 5 used in the distillation. A simulated distillation method described in ASTM D2887 may also be used to obtain TBP data for crude oils.
ASTM D86 (atmospheric distillation) and ASTM D1160 (vacuum distillation) are used for low-boiling, and high-boiling fractions, respectively.
[6] Refining Overview - Petroleum, Products and Processes, AIChE, 2000.
[7] Riazi, M.R., “Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions,” MNL5, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.
It is important to use the correct terms to clearly represent the fractionation of crude oil by distillation. The distillation temperatures, or cut points, are used to delineate the distiilate fractions and define commercial fuels and solvents.
Using a crude TBP curve, cut points are defined as the temperatures that represent the limits of a distillate fraction, as illustrated in Figure 4.11. For example, for kerosene, fraction Ta represents the lower cut point, and Tb represents the upper cut point in Figure 4.11.
Boiling ranges between the cut points represent distillate products, such as naphtha, kerosene, light gas oil, etc. The difference between the cumulative volume percent at upper and lower cut points is reported as the yield (in volume %) for the particular distillate fraction. For example, for the crude represented in Figure 4.11, the kerosene yield can be calculated as 40%(at Tb) -20% (Ta) = 20% by volume. Table 4.1 shows the TBP cut points for crude oil distillate fractions.
Distillate Product | Boiling Range |
---|---|
Butanes and Lighter | |
Light SR Naphtha | 90 - 190o F (32-88o C) |
Heavy Naphtha | 190 - 380o F (88 - 193o C) |
Kerosene | 380 - 520o F (193 - 271o C) |
Light Gas Oil | 520 - 610o F (271 - 321o C) |
Heavy Gas Oil | 610 - 800o F (321 - 425o C) |
Light Vacuum Gas Oil | 800 - 950o F (425 - 510o C) |
Heavy Vacuum Gas Oil | 950 - 1050o F (510 - 564o C) |
Vacuum Residue | > 1050o F (>565o C) |
The quality of separation in fractional distillation can be calculated using the designated cut points (at 5%vol and 95%vol) for the two adjacent fractions, termed as light and heavy. As shown below, the difference in temperature (ΔT) between 5% vol temperature of the heavy fraction and 95%vol temperature of the light fraction is used to define the quality of separation. A positive value of ΔT(termed ASTM gap) indicates good separation, while a negative value of ΔT (termed ASTM overlap) points to a bad separation.
Fractionation
What defines a good separation?
The relationship between the ASTM distillation temperatures at 95% vol and 5% vol of two adjacent fractions, light and heavy, respectively.
ASTM 5% volT (heavy fraction) - 95% volT (light fraction) = ∆T
(e.g., LGO) (e.g., kerosene)
if ∆T >0, called ASTM gap (good separation)
if ∆T<0, called ASTM overlap (bad separation)
Each week, you will be required to do a number of assignments. This week, in addition to the reading assignments listed on the overview page, you are also required to complete the exercise questions and take a quiz which will cover the material in Lessons 3 and 4.
Submit your answers by creating and uploading your pdf to the Exercise 3 Assignment in the Lesson 4 Module. Please Note: Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable unless showing something on the graphs provided.
Using the correlations in Figure 4.13, calculate how many plates will be needed between kerosene and light gas oil (LGO) draw-off trays to obtain a 10°F ASTM gap between kerosene products. The TPB 50% temperatures are 300° F and 550° F for kerosene and diesel products, respectively. The reflux ratio is given as 0.5. Consider a) no steam for stripping, b) maximum steam for stripping. Comment on the results. 40 pts
Once you have a solution to the exercises, you will submit your answers as a PDF to be graded. Please follow the instructions below.
All quizzes are located in the Quizzes folder in Canvas. Quiz 2 will cover the topics in Lessons 3 and 4.
Take a few minutes to answer the questions below to check your knowledge before taking the quiz or submitting your exercises.
Distillation, a key separation process in petroleum refining, is considered as a gateway to all refinery processes. Fractionation of crude oil by distillation into a number of streams generates feedstocks for all the subsequent separation, conversion, and finishing processes that lead to the refinery
products. Prior to distillation, crude oil is subjected to desalting to remove in particular the Cl¯ion to prevent corrosion in downstream processes. Both atmospheric and vacuum distillation processes are used to separate the desired fractions from crude oil which has a boiling range of over a 1000° F. Three different distillation methods used in the laboratory include True Boiling Point distillation, used for characterization of crude oils, ASTM distillation for product characterization, and Equilibrium Flash Vaporization for conducting efficient flash operations in the refinery. The performance of an atmospheric distillation column can be monitored through using the ASTM distillation data obtained for the distillate products. The three parameters that control the performance of a distillation column in terms of the quality of separation achieved in the process are a number of plates, reflux ratio, and the amount of steam used in the operations. Empirical correlation relates these three factors to control the quality of separation in an operating distillation column or help design a new distillation column.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 4! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 5. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found within this lesson.
Reading | J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Chapter 4 (Crude Distillation) |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 3: Submit your answers to the Exercise 3 assignment in the Lesson 4 Module. Quiz 2: Will cover the material in Lessons 3 and 4. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
This section will continue to discuss the separation processes that are carried out on the distillate products obtained from the atmospheric and vacuum distillation units, and the residue from the vacuum distillation unit, as introduced in Section 4. Light Ends Unit (LEU) fractionates the lightest fraction of crude oil obtained as overhead distillate from the atmospheric column in a series of distillation towers to produce LPG as a refinery product and straight-run light, and heavy naphtha for further processing in finishing and conversion units to produce gasoline streams for the blending pool (Section 3). Vacuum distillation residue (VDR) can be fractionated using solvent extraction (deasphalting) to produce an insoluble (asphalt) and a soluble fraction, deasphalted oil (DAO). DAO can be further processed by freezing point separation in a suitable solvent to separate wax. The remaining dewaxed oil is used as base stock for producing lubricating oil. Heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) can also be used as a feedstock for dewaxing.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignments page within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 15 (Lubricating Oil Feedstocks) |
---|---|
Assignments | Exam 1 will cover the material in Lessons 1-5. Exam 1 is found in the Exam 1 Module. Exercise 4:
|
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion Forum (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Because of the low molecular weight and high volatility of the constituents in the overhead distillate, the feedstock to LEU can be analyzed on a molecular basis, using, for example, a gas chromatograph. The hydrocarbon range in overhead distillate (over a boiling point of gas to 380°F mid-boiling point) covers carbon numbers C1 through C10. Because of the relatively simple composition of this feed, the quality of separation in LEU units can be defined in terms of the concentrations of selected hydrocarbon compounds such as propane, butane, and i- butane. Remember that one needs to use the distillation data to define the quality of separation (in terms of ASTM gap, or ASTM overlap) between the adjacent cuts obtained from the side of atmospheric distillation column (Lesson 4).
Figure 5.1 shows the separation scheme in light end towers, where the feed is separated into the distillate (low-boiling point) and bottom (high-boiling point) fractions. Considering a depropanizer unit, the distillate will consist mainly of propane and lighter compounds, whereas the bottoms will contain butane and heavier hydrocarbons. To determine the degree of separation in the light end towers, the first step is to select the key components, which may be real compounds (such as butane, or i-butane), or a pseudo component which is defined by the mid-boiling point of the boiling range (i.e., temperature at which 50%vol of the selected component is evaporated). Two key components (light key and heavy key) must be selected using the two selection rules, as shown in Figure 5.1.
The key component selection rules are:
Once the key components are selected, their concentrations in the distillate and bottom fractions and their respective vapor liquid equilibrium coefficients (K values) can be used in the Fenske Equation to calculate the number of theoretical plates (including a reboiler) needed in the distillation column under the ideal condition of total reflux (100% reflux). Figure 5.2 shows the Fenske Equation and defines all the terms used in the equation. The ideal conditions assumed for using the Fenske Equation include 100% plate efficiency (for perfect separation in a plate) and total reflux in the column where no product is drawn as distillate. Total reflux means the whole overhead product is refluxed back to the column. Obviously, to get data on an actual (not an ideal) case of distillation, one needs to make two corrections to obtain the actual number of plates from the number of theoretical plates used in, or calculated by the Fenske Equation: 1) by assuming an actual plate efficiency to correct for 100% plate efficiency), 2) by assuming a correction factor to correct from total reflux (or infinite reflux ratio to the operational (actual) reflux conditions).
It is common to use an actual plate efficiency of 75% (for plate efficiency correction), and a correction factor of 1.5 (for reflux ratio correction) for the operation under a finite (actual) reflux ratio from the total reflux condition. Therefore, these corrections could be made as follows:
# [actual plates (at 75% efficiency) at total reflux] = [theoretical # plates (at 100% efficiency)]/0.75
# [actual plates (at normal reflux)] = 1.5 x [actual plates (at 75% efficiency) at total reflux]
In other words, making both corrections from #theoretical plates used in Fenske equation to #actual plates after both corrections (for plate efficiency and reflux conditions) would give:
# actual plates = ([#theoretical plates used in Fenske Equation]/0.75) x 1.5
Using the problem definition given in Figure 5.3, calculate n-C4 flow rate in the distillate product, if the debutanizer column has 18 (actual) plates.
The concentration of i- C5 should be <1 mole% of total C4’s and lighter compounds in the distillate product.
Column efficiency =75%, Reflux correction factor =1.5
Mean tower conditions: 210°F and 110 psig
Select appropriate light and heavy keys, and use the K values for the corresponding key compounds using the chart given in Figure 5.4 at the mean tower conditions.
Once you have calculated your answer, post it in the Exercises Dropbox inside the Lesson 5 folder in Canvas.
If possible, submit a Microsoft Word, or Excel document, showing all the steps in your calculations, indicate the K values you read from the nomograms, and assumptions, if any. You may submit scanned images or clear handwritten pages as a pdf that is less than 2 MB in size.
While distillation achieves separation/fractionation of the feed components with respect to differences in their boiling point, deasphalting (as a solvent extraction process) fractionates the feedstock, atmospheric, or more often vacuum distillation residue (VDR), with respect to solubility/insolubility of molecular components in a given solvent. Figure 5.5 shows a solvent fractionation scheme used in laboratories to separate VDR into fractions that are defined based on the solubility behavior. VDR, which could be a solid at ambient temperature, is completely dissolved in aromatic solvents such as benzene and toluene. The highest molecular weight components of VDR classified as “asphaltene” can be separated by precipitation (as solid material) when a light paraffin solvent is mixed with VDR solubilized in an aromatic solvent (e.g., toluene). The paraffin solvent used (e.g., n-heptane) defines the identity of the separated asphaltenes (e.g., toluene soluble and n-heptane insolubles). The portion of VDR that is soluble in the paraffin solvent is called maltenes, but also labeled with respect to the solvent used in the separation, i.e., n-heptane maltenes. As can be seen in Figure 5.5, the n-heptane solubles can further be separated using n-pentane (a lighter and a weaker solvent) into insoluble (hard resin) and soluble (n-pentane solubles) fractions. The n-pentane solubles can also be separated using a lighter solvent yet (propane) to soft resin and oil products. In refinery practice, only one stage of separation is used, using the lightest solvent (e.g., propane) to produce asphalt and deasphalted oil (DAO) fractions, as discussed later in this section.
Asphaltenes consist of high-molecular weight compounds with strong aromatic character and contain the highest concentrations of heteroatom (S, N, and metal) species. Because of the low H/C ratio of asphaltenes and resins, the deasphalting process can be considered as a “carbon rejection” process, yielding a high H/C ratio product (i.e., oil) after removing the asphaltenes and resins, as, typically, lower value byproducts.
Because of the large disparity in structure and properties of asphaltenes and oil fractions in VDR, it is surprising that VDR appears as a solution (one-phase material) rather than a suspension of discrete asphaltene particles in VDR. A commonly accepted hypothesis to explain the single phase observed with VDR is known as the gradient solubility model, illustrated in Figure 5.6. The model claims that asphaltene molecules (depicted as dark spheres in Figure 5.6a) can be dissolved in resins (light spheres) and the resulting solution can be dissolved in oil (wiggly lines), thus producing a single phase solution. Some model molecular structures proposed for asphaltenes are shown in Figures 5.6b and 5.6c. There is a more widespread acceptance of the smaller molecular structures shown in 6c, as better representatives of asphaltenes molecules among the asphaltene researchers.
The gradient solubility model offers an explanation of how asphaltenes can be forced out of the solution in VDR by solvent extraction. Briefly, the solubility of a compound in a given solvent depends on the strength of the solvent that is measured by Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP) for non-polar solvents. The two definitions of HSP are given in Figure 5.7, indicating the dependence of the parameter values on surface tension and molar volume of the solvent (1st Hildebrand parameter), or on the energy of vaporization (heat necessary to evaporate the solvent under constant volume conditions) and molar volume (2nd Hildebrand Parameter), respectively. These parameters correlate well with one another, and each can be used without any preference to express the dissolving power of a solvent. A discussion of the Solution Theory is beyond the scope of this course, but it would suffice to consider that solubility parameter increases with the increasing density (decreasing molar volume) and increasing surface tension, or increasing latent heat of vaporization. This explains why aromatic solvents have higher solvent power than aliphatic hydrocarbons, and why the solvent power of paraffins decreases with the decreasing carbon number.
It is now possible to explain that using a large volume of a paraffin solvent, added to dissolved VDR in a laboratory experiment, effectively disrupts the gradient solubility of asphaltenes, and as a result, asphaltenes precipitate as solid particles and can be filtered out for recovery. In refinery deasphalting process, however, e.g., in propane deasphalting [1], lower quantities of solvent (or lower solvent to resid (S/R) ratio) is used to separate asphalt (asphaltenes + resins) and deasphalted oil (DAO).
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 15, pp.311-312.
Figure 5.8 places the deasphalting process in a refinery flow scheme as an intermediate process between vacuum distillation and dewaxing processes, for producing the refinery output streams as asphalt deasphalted oil (DAO), which can be directed to another separation process, dewaxing, to produce lubricating oil base stock and wax, or can be sent to conversion units such as hydrocracking to produce light and middle distillate fuels. It is important to note that the deasphalting process is an upgrading process to transform VDR into marketable products, and/or convert it to distillate fuels that command high demands.
The two objectives of the deasphalting process are:
Depending on the properties of the VDR and prevailing markets, the emphasis could be placed on one of these objectives. Remember that aromatic asphaltic crudes are more expensive to convert into distillate fuels. Such crudes could be processed readily into making high yields of asphalt and serve the asphalt market. With lighter crudes, the principal focus could be on removing the asphaltenes from VDR so that DAO produced can be used in conversion processes with a lower extent of problems caused by asphaltenes such as coke buildup, or metals buildup on catalysts in, for example, hydrotreating or hydrocracking reactions.
Figure 5.9 shows a simplified flow diagram of a propane deasphalting process. See a more detailed flow diagram in your textbook, along with a description of the operating conditions in the commercial process. As the first step in deasphalting, residue (feedstock) is mixed with four to eight times the volume of liquid propane. Heavier residua require a higher solvent to residue (S/R ) ratio for effective separation of asphalt. Following the precipitation of asphalt, DAO, and asphalt are separated, and each stream is purified and flashed to recover and recycle the propane solvent, as shown in Figure 5.9.
The four-unit operations of deasphalting illustrated in the process flow diagram are:
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 15, pp.311-312.
Independent variables in the deasphalting process include the solvent used, pressure, temperature, S/R, and contact time. These variables can be controlled to obtain the optimum conditions for the desired separation in deasphalting. One of the important dependent variables in the process is the asphaltene yield. Figure 5.10 shows, in qualitative plots, how asphaltene yield varies as a function of the process parameters.
Solubility parameter of the solvent is a key a variable that affects asphaltene yield. Asphaltene is completely soluble in toluene, which has a high solubility parameter. Therefore, the asphaltene yield with toluene will be zero (Figure 5.10a). Propane (C3,) which has the lowest solubility parameter among the solvents given in the plot, will give the highest asphaltene yield.
Figure 5.10b shows that asphaltene yield increases with the increasing solvent/residue ratio used in the process. This is an unusual behavior for solvent extraction because, typically, the yield of an insoluble fraction would decrease with the increasing quantity of solvent used in the extraction behavior. The unusual behavior seen in Fig. 5.10b is termed as the “anti-solvent effect.” This relates to the gradient theory of asphaltene solubility in crude oil (or in VDR) such that larger quantities of paraffin solvent used in the process more effectively disrupt the gradient solubility by removing more oils from VDR, forcing the asphalt fraction (asphaltene+resin) to separate out. One should point out here that the molecular composition of the asphaltenes would vary significantly along with the yield of asphaltenes in the plot shown in Figure 5.10b. As the yield of asphaltenes increases with the increasing S/R, lower molecular weight asphaltenes would be progressively included in the separated asphaltenes. In other words, for a given process, low yields of asphaltenes (obtained at low S/R) would contain the highest molecular weight and highly aromatic compounds, whereas asphaltenes obtained at high yield with high SR ratio would include a broader range of molecular weight and aromaticity in the separated asphaltenes.
The consideration of variable asphaltene composition would also apply to the asphaltenes separated with different paraffin solvents, as shown in Figure 5.4b. In this case, lower yields of asphaltenes obtained with C7 (n-heptane) will be associated with heavier and more aromatic asphaltenes than those obtained with propane (C3). These observations relate to the absence of a precise molecular definition to express the complex of asphaltenes, but the need to use an operational definition on the basis of solubility/insolubility in a given solvent. It should, therefore, be remembered that the composition of the asphaltenes, or asphalt produced in a refinery would not only depend on the properties and composition of the parent crude oil, but also on the solvent, as well as the S/R ratio used in the process among other factors, such as temperature and pressure as they affect the solubility parameters of the solvent. Figure 5.10c shows the dependence of asphaltene yield on temperature, as explained by the decreasing solubility parameter of the solvent used in this case with the increasing temperature. A sufficient amount of contact time with paraffin is necessary for good asphaltene separation. The 8-10 h contact time refers to batch experiments in the laboratory. In flow systems of commercial deasphalting, the contact time necessary for the desired separation of asphalt is much shorter.
Another important separation process in petroleum refining is removal of wax. The process of dewaxing is introduced and discussed in the next subsection.
Figure 5.11 locates the dewaxing process in the refinery landscape. The feedstocks to dewaxing include DAO from deasphalting, and HVGO from vacuum distillation as shown in Figure 5.11 along with some compositional characteristics of the feedstock and the dewaxing product. Note that wax (long-chain paraffins) obtained in dewaxing is a marketable by-product. Lubricating oil base stock is the principal product of interest. The main purpose of dewaxing is to remove hydrocarbons that solidify readily (i.e., wax) for making lubricating oil base stock with low pour points (-9 to 14°F).
In addition to low pour points, other important properties of lube oil base stocks include:
All of these properties depend on the molecular composition of the hydrocarbons constituting the lubricating oil base stocks. Commercial engine oils and other commercial lube oils are formulated with chemical additives that would enhance the performance of the base stocks.
Two commercial methods of dewaxing are:
Figure 5.12 shows a general scheme of solvent dewaxing that uses stage-wise refrigeration of the feedstock after it is mixed with the solvent. The lowest temperature used in the refrigeration cascade depends on the desired pour point of the lube oil's base stock product. Upon refrigeration, wax compounds solidify to form crystals. Wax crystals are carried in the solvent to a rotary filter, where wax is separated on a filter cloth covering the rotating drum. The layer of wax (filter cake) on the drum is scraped from the filter by a blade and carried away in a solvent stream to a steam-stripping unit to recover and recycle the solvent separated from the wax product. The wax product, called slack wax, can be used to make paraffin wax for candles, microwax used in the cosmetics industry, and petrolatum for petroleum jelly. The dewaxed oil from the filtration unit is also steam stripped to recover the solvent to produce the lube oil base stock.
The two principal solvents used in solvent dewaxing units are methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and propane. Although the majority of dewaxing units in the U.S. refineries use MEK), some advantages of using propane as a solvent compared to MEK include the following [2]:
[2] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 15, pp.318-321.
Although included under the separation processes, catalytic dewaxing is actually a low-severity conversion process involving a selective catalytic cracking of n-paraffins. Because of removing wax (long chain n-paraffins) by chemical reaction, the process is called dewaxing. The selective cracking of n-alkanes takes place in the pores of molecular sieve catalysts (zeolites) with pore openings in the order of 0.6nm, which keep i-paraffins out because of their larger size due to branching in the hydrocarbon skeleton, as shown in Figure 5.13. This selective cracking increases the ratio of i-paraffins to n-paraffins in the product and lowers its pour point. Hydrogen is introduced along with the feed to prevent coking on the catalyst surfaces (Figure 5.14). The cracking of n-paraffins produces distillate fuels such as gasoline as a by-product from catalytic dewaxing.
The advantages of catalytic dewaxing include [3]:
[3] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 15, pp.321-322.
Please take a few minutes to answer the questions before attempting this week's assessments. Click Check when you are happy with your answers.
Each week, you will be required to do a number of assignments. This week, in addition to the reading assignments listed on the overview page, Exercise 4 is due as well as Exam 1 which will cover everything in Lesson 1-5.
Exam 1 will cover the material in Lessons 1-5. Check the Syllabus and Course Calendar for Exam 1 schedule and venue.
Work on the questions using MS Word, Excel, or PowerPoint and save your work as a PDF to submit to the assignment which accepts only PDF documents. Submit both parts of this exercise as one PDF document.
Using the problem definition given in Figure 5.3 below, calculate the n-C4 flow rate in the distillate product, if the debutanizer column has 18 (actual) plates.
Constraint:
The concentration of i- C5 should be <1 mole% of total C4’s and lighter compounds in the distillate product.
Given:
Column efficiency =75%, Reflux correction factor =1.5
Mean tower conditions : 210°F and 110 psig
Select appropriate light and heavy keys, and use the K values for the corresponding key compounds using the chart given in Figure 5.4 at the mean tower conditions.
A refinery in Northwest Pennsylvania produces asphalt as an important product that brings revenue, particularly during the summer months. In late fall this refinery switches operations to produce more fuel oil from VDR for the coming winter months, producing still some asphalt, but in lower quantity. Explain which of the following switches will take place in the refinery in about a month, and why? 40 pts
a) Switch the deasphalting solvent from propane to pentane.
b) Switch the deasphalting solvent from pentane to propane.
Would the summer, or winter asphalt product be “heavier”? Explain why.
Submit your answers as a PDF in the Exercise 4 assignment inside the Lesson 5 Module, showing all the steps in your calculations, indicate the K values you read from the nomograms, and state your assumptions, if any.
Important Note: You may submit scanned images or clear handwritten pages as a PDF that is less than 2 MB in size for this exercise. The scanned pages should relate to using the graphs for solving the problem. The rest should be type-written for ease of reading when grading.
Once you have a solution to the exercises, you will submit your answers as a PDF by uploading your file to be graded.
Separation of the lowest-boiling fraction of the crude oil is carried out in Light Ends Unit using distillation columns that may yield almost pure products, such as propane and butane. Because of the simple molecular composition of the light ends, it is possible to use the data on vapor liquid equilibrium coefficients of pure compounds. On the heaviest end of the crude oil, Vacuum Distillation Residue can be processed using solvent extraction to separate asphalt from the residue to produce deasphalted oil for further treatment either by dewaxing to produce lubricating oil base stock, or by conversion reactions to produce distillate fuels from the deasphalted oil.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 5! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 6. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Chapter 15 (Lubricating Oil Feedstocks) |
---|---|
Assignments | Exam 1: Will cover the material in Lessons 1-5. Exam 1 is found in the Exam 1 Module. Exercise 4:
|
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Thermal cracking is the first commercial conversion process developed in the early 1900s principally to produce more motor gasoline from crude oils and produce high-octane gasoline for aircraft use, initiating an attempt to change the composition of crude oil in petroleum refinery. The purpose of thermal cracking is to make light middle distillates from heavier ends by pyrolysis, or thermolysis. With the advent of catalytic cracking in the 1930s and 1940s and its capability to produce higher yields of gasoline with higher octane number, thermal cracking of gas oils has ceased to be an important process for gasoline production in modern refineries. In countries where the principal petroleum fuel with a high demand is diesel fuel, thermal cracking is still important in fuel refineries. A principal application of thermal cracking of distillate fractions in current refineries is limited to naphtha cracking for the purpose of producing ethylene (C2H4) for the petrochemical industry. However, thermal cracking of residual fractions, particularly VDR, is still practiced in association with visbreaking and coking processes in the refineries. The chemistry of thermal cracking and thermal cracking processes is discussed in this section.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignments page within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 5 |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 5: A coil visbreaker operates at 500°C for 1 min. How long will it take to achieve the same thermal severity at 450°C in a soaker visbreaking process? An apparent Arrhenius activation energy for thermal cracking is given as 50 kcal/mol. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Thermal cracking produces shorter straight chain alkanes from longer straight chains found in gas oils or other crude oil fractions. Free radicals (reactive species with unpaired electrons, but no electronic charge) are the active species that govern thermal cracking reactions. Because of the free radical chemistry, thermal cracking of gas oil would produce gasoline with relatively low octane numbers, as will be discussed later in this section.
Figure 6.1 lists the three steps of free radical chain reactions as initiation, propagation, and termination. In the figure, R-H represents a paraffin chain which can be expanded such as (H3-(CH2)n – H) where n represents the number of carbon atoms in the alkane. In other words, R represents a radical with an unpaired electron that becomes an alkane (R-H) when combined with a hydrogen atom. A Hydrogen atom with one proton and one electron is the simplest radical.
The free radical chain reaction starts with breaking the weakest C-C bond in the reactant alkane (R-H) to form two free radicals R1 and R2, each with one unpaired electron resulting from the homolysis of the C-C bond (initiation). Once formed by the initiation step, each free radical can go through two different propagation reactions:
In a hydrogen abstraction reaction, for example, the radical R1 removes (abstracts) a hydrogen atom from an alkane (R-H) to produce a shorter chain alkane product (R1-H) and a new radical R (hydrogen abstraction), thus propagating the free radical chain. Alternatively, the radical R1, (or R2) can go through a β scission reaction to produce an olefin (ethylene) as a product, and a radical R to propagate the chain. The β scission refers to the breaking of the covalent bond in the β position relative to the position of the unpaired electron, as shown below:
Note that the initiation step produces two free radicals, the propagation step produces a reaction product and one radical to continue the chain. The last step in the chain reaction, the termination step, removes two radicals to produce one or two stable compounds depending on the termination reaction, as seen in Figure 6.1. The principal end result of the free radical chain reactions in thermal cracking is to produce from long chain alkanes shorter-chain alkanes, light olefins, and some aromatic compounds. One important feature of free radical reactions is that isomerization reactions, e.g., shifting of the unpaired electron site from an edge atom of a molecule to the interior atoms (as shown in Figure 6.1), are not favored reactions. In other words, isomerization reactions take place at a slower rate than other propagation reactions, e.g., β scission reaction. The critical importance of this observation is that the thermal cracking reactions produce shorter straight-chain alkanes and olefins without any significant formation of branched-chain (or iso-alkanes). This is the reason why catalytic cracking processes have virtually replaced thermal cracking processes to produce high octane number gasoline, as will be discussed in the next section on catalytic cracking.
Please take a few minutes to answer the question below. Click "Check My Answer" to see some feedback.
Question: Why is hydrogen abstraction reaction favored over β scission at high pressures?
Management of thermal reactivity is important in thermal cracking processes for optimum conversion of the feeds with a wide boiling range. Figure 6.2 shows an example of a thermal cracking process to convert a heavy gas oil fraction primarily to light gas oil (LGO). Typically, lighter products (gasoline and gas) and the heavier product (fuel oil) are considered by-products in this process. A heavy gas oil feedstock with a wide boiling range is fed to a fractionator to separate the feed into a light oil and a heavy oil fraction, depending on the desired cut points. Light oil (which would have a relatively low thermal reactivity) is heated in a separate furnace to higher temperatures so that the cracking takes place in a vapor phase. Heavy oil fraction (with a high thermal reactivity) is heated to a lower temperature for cracking in the liquid phase. The heated feed streams are combined in a soak drum to provide sufficient time for the completion of the cracking reactions. After the soaker, the products are sent to a flash separator to separate the heavy end as a side product (fuel oil) and the lighter products are sent to the fractionator for separation into LGO, gasoline and the gaseous products. Separating the feed into two fractions will avoid heating the reactive longer alkane chains to high temperatures to keep coke formation and gas production under control to maximize the LGO yield. In naphtha cracking for ethylene production, all reactions are carried out in vapor phase at low pressures to promote β scission reactions for high ethylene yields. Coking of reactor tubes creates a major maintenance problem in naphtha cracking for ethylene production.
Visbreaking is a mild thermal cracking process applied to reduce the viscosity of VDR to produce fuel oil and some light products to increase the distillate yield in a refinery [1]. Depending on the feedstock properties and thermal severity in the reactor, the process will typically achieve 10–25% of conversion of the heavy ends to gas, gasoline, and distillates while producing fuel oil with the desired specifications. Carbon rejection in small quantities on the reactor surfaces during thermal cracking helps reduce the viscosity of the fuel oil product (Figure 6.3). The process decreases the demand for a cutter stock used as diluent (e.g., kerosene) that might otherwise be used to reduce the viscosity of the heavy ends to meet the fuel oil specifications. Adding a diluent may still be needed, depending on the sulfur content of the product and the fuel oil specifications. Although the principal objective of visbreaking is to reduce viscosity, some refineries may use this mild cracking process to convert fuel oil into lighter distillates.
As in all chemical reactions, conversion in visbreaking depends primarily on temperature and time. As a measure of “thermal severity” under reactions conditions, one can use a thermal severity index (TSI) as a function of temperature and time that is shown in Figure 6.4. The exponential dependence of TSI on temperature relates to the general exponential term that constitutes the chemical reaction rate constants. The chemical conversion in visbreaking reactions can be expressed as the reduction in concentration (cA) of long-chain alkane (or high-molecular weight compounds) in the feedstocks. One can see from Figure 6.4 that the conversion in the visbreaking reaction can be expressed by the integral in Figure 6.4, assuming an apparent first-order kinetics for the reaction. It can also be seen, in Figure 6.4, that the conversion that can be related to the extent of visbreaking depends on (kt); and the TSI to establish the interchangeability of T and t for a given conversion relates to (e(-Ea/RT)t), where Ea is the apparent activation energy of the reaction, R is the universal gas constant, T is the temperature, and t is time. In using the TSI for comparing thermal severity of different T and t combinations as major operating variables of visbreaking, care should be taken to use the right units for R and T. As a general convention, an apparent activation of energy of 50 kcal/mol is assumed for thermal cracking reactions involving the homolysis of C-C bonds to produce free radicals.
Higher visbreaking severity would produce a higher reduction in viscosity. Thermal severity is limited by the reactivity of the feedstock and the storage stability of the residual fuel in accordance with the desired conversion level and desired reduction in viscosity. Asphaltene content and concarbon of the feedstocks are important factors to consider when selecting an appropriate thermal severity for the process to prevent excessive coking in the visbreaking reactor.
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 5, pp.111-116.
There are two types of visbreaking processes: coil or soaker visbreaking. Figure 6.5a shows a schematic diagram of the coil visbreaking process. For visbreaking, the feedstock is introduced into the coil heated in the furnace, where the thermal cracking reactions take place. At the furnace outlet, the reaction products are immediately quenched using a portion of the gas oil product from the fractionator to stop the thermal cracking reactions. The quenched products are sent to the fractionator for separation into gas, gasoline, light gas oil, and visbroken residue streams. A steam stripper can be used with the fractionator for better separation of the visbreaking products. In the soaker visbreaking process, a soak drum is placed after the furnace, Figure 6.5b. Most of the thermal cracking reactions, in this case, take place in the soaker drum.
Depending on the process objectives and feedstock characteristics, reaction temperatures range from 450°C to 485°C and pressures ranging from 3 to 10 bar. Higher temperatures and lower residence times are used in the coil visbreaking process.
Residence times can vary from 1 min (associated with high temperatures in coil visbreaking) to 10 min (for lower temperatures used in soaker visbreaking).
Similar to deasphalting and distillation, the environmental impact of visbreaking is associated with burning fuel in the furnace to provide energy for thermal cracking, and, to a lesser extent, burning off the coke deposited in the coil or soaker drum leading to emissions of CO2, oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and oxides of sulfur (SOx) in the flue gases.
A coil visbreaker operates at 500°C for 1 min. How long will it take to achieve the same thermal severity at 450°C in a soaker visbreaking process? An apparent Arrhenius activation energy for thermal cracking is given as 50 kcal/mol.
Despite the development of catalytic cracking processes, coking processes have survived as a popular refining process all over the world to refine the heavy end of crudes or heavy oils through carbon rejection as coke. Coking is the most severe thermal process used in the refinery to treat the very bottom-of-the-barrel of crude oil, i.e., vacuum residue.
Because of the high severity of thermal cracking during coking, the residue feed is completely converted to gas, light and medium distillates, and coke with no production of residual oil. Three different coking processes are used in the refineries: delayed coking, fluid coking, and flexi-coking (a variation of fluid coking). The common objective of the three coking processes is to maximize the yield of distillate products in a refinery by rejecting large quantities of carbon in the residue as solid coke, known as petroleum coke. Complete rejection of metals with the coke product provides an attractive alternative for upgrading the extra-heavy crude and bitumen, and that is particularly useful for initial processing of tar (or oil) sands for liberating the hydrocarbons from the sand that is left behind with the coke. Finding markets for the coke product as fuel or as filler for manufacturing anodes for the electrolysis of alumina (possible only with petroleum coke from delayed coking) makes the economics of coking more attractive by creating value for the rejected carbon. Sulfur and metal contents of the petroleum coke, as determined by the sulfur and metal contents of the residue feed, are two important factors that affect the commercial value of petroleum coke. Of the two coking processes, delayed coking is the preferred approach in many refineries that process heavy crudes.
Figure 6.6 shows a flow scheme in a delayed coking progress and a photograph of a delayed coking unit. The derricks above the drums that contain the drill stems are used to drill out the coke from the coke drums at the end of the coking cycle.
As shown in Figure 6.6, the residue feed is introduced to the fractionator after being heated in the heat exchangers with the coker gas oil products. The bottoms from the fractionator, including the heavy ends of the vacuum residue feed with heavy coker gas oil recycle, are mixed with steam and sent to the tubular heater in the furnace to be heated to approximately 475°C at a pressure of 10-30 psi. Steam is added to prevent coking in the heater, and the heated feed is introduced from the bottom of one of the coke drums. The coking takes place in the insulated coke drum as the drum fills up for a period of 16–18 h. While drum A is being filled up, drum B is decoked by using hydraulic cutters and the drilling stem, and the coke is removed from the bottom of the drum. As the coking in drum A is completed, drum B should be decoked, sealed, heated, and prepared for switching the feed. The coking cycle is controlled such that the vacuum residue is continuously fed to the unit (because the vacuum column works around the clock) and the fluid products are recovered continuously, while coke is removed intermittently in a semi-continuous process scheme. Therefore, there are at least two coke drums in every delayed coking unit, and some units have more than two drums. All of the heat necessary for coking is provided in the heater, whereas coking takes place in the coke drum; hence, the process is called “delayed coking.”
The hot product vapors and steam from the top of the drum are quenched by the incoming feed in the fractionator to prevent coking in the fractionator and to strip the lighter components of the vacuum residue feed. The fractionator separates the coking products into gasses, coker naphtha, coker light gas oil, and coker heavy gas oil. A side-steam stripper is used with the fractionator to ensure a good separation between the coker naphtha and light gas oil streams [2].
The delayed coking operating variables include heater outlet temperature, pressure, recycle ratio, and cycle time. These variables are selected based on feed properties such as the characterization factor, asphaltene content, and Conradson Carbon Residue (CCR) to ensure that coking in tubular heaters is minimized, and liquid product yield is maximized. The recycle ratio, which is typically 3–5%, is used to control the endpoint of the coker heavy gas oil. The coke yield can vary from 20% to 30% depending on the feed properties and coking conditions. In the textbook, you may find some proposed equations to predict coke and other product yields on the basis of the CCR of the vacuum residue and estimates of the distribution of sulfur in the feed among the coking products, suggesting that up to 30 wt% of the sulfur in the feed ends up in the coke, 30 wt% in the gas product, and 20 wt% in the coker heavy gas oil.
[2] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 5, pp.97-111.
There are two kinds of coke produced by delayed coking of VDR: high-density shot coke, and porous sponge coke. Figure 6.7 shows the appearances of shot coke, consisting of aggregates of ~5 mm diameter spherical particles (resembling buckshots) and sponge coke (with a porous structure resembling a sponge). The formation of shot coke is usually troublesome because of difficulties in removing the coke from the drums and problems with grinding, although shot coke has some niche applications, such as in titanium dioxide (TiO2) production. Sponge coke is used as solid fuel, and manufacturing anodes for aluminum production, if its sulfur and metal concentrations are sufficiently low.
Among the delayed coking products, needle coke is a specialty coke produced mostly from coking of a highly aromatic FCC decant oil. The major properties of the needle coke include a low coefficient of thermal expansion, a low puffing (sudden volume expansion) tendency during graphitization because of lower nitrogen and sulfur contents, and high mechanical strength. The anode coke has limits on metal contaminants, requiring less than 500 ppm of Ni and V in the coke. The price of fuel coke depends on its carbon purity (S, N, and metal contaminants); however, the fuel coke is traded at a price comparable to that of coal.
Fluid coking and flexi-coking are fluid-bed processes developed from the basic principles of FCC, with close integration of endothermic (cracking, coking, or gasification) and exothermic (coke burning) reactions. In fluid coking and flexi-coking processes, part of the coke product is burned to provide the heat necessary for coking reactions to convert vacuum residua into gasses, distillate liquids, and coke. Flexi-coking, as a variation of fluid coking, provides the options of partial or complete gasification of the coke product to produce a fuel gas with some or no coke in the product slate. Different from the bulk liquid-phase coking in delayed coking, coking takes place on the surface of circulating coke particles of coke heated by burning the surface layers of accumulated coke in a separate burner. Figure 6.8 shows a schematic flow diagram of the fluid coking process. The preheated vacuum residue is sprayed onto the hot coke particles heated in the burner by partial combustion of coke produced in the previous cycle. Using fluid beds in the reactor and burner provides efficient heat transfer and fast coking on a collectively large surface area of the small coke particles circulating between the reactor and burner. The products of coking are sent to a fractionator (similar to that used in delayed coking after recovery of fine coke particles). Steam is also added at the bottom of the reactor (not shown in the figure) in a scrubber to strip heavy liquids sticking to the surface of coke particles before they are sent to the burner. This steam also provides fluidization of coke particles in the reactor. The reactor and the burner operate at temperatures of 510–570°C and 595–675°C, respectively.
Higher temperatures and short residence times in the reactor lead to higher liquid and lower coke yields compared with those of delayed coking. Coke is deposited layer by layer on the fluidized coke particles in the reactor. Air is injected into the burner to burn 15–30 % of the coke produced in the reactor, part of the particles are returned to the reactor, and the remainder is drawn out as the fluid coke product. Fluid coking can process heavier VDR and gives a higher distillate yield (and lower coke yield) than delayed coking.
Figure 6.9 shows a schematic diagram of flexi-coking. A gasifier is added for conversion of some or all coke produced in the coker in reaction with air and steam to produce a synthesis gas. The hot coke particles from the combustor are circulated back to the coking reactor to provide the heat necessary for coking. The distillate products from the coker are sent to the fractionator, as is done in the fluid coking process. On the gasifier outlet, after removing the fine particles from the gas by cyclones, the gas is cooled in a direct-contact cooler to condense the sour water and recover the flexi-gas. The product gas can be used as fuel gas in the refinery. Depending on the demand, the flexi-coking process can produce both fluid coke and fuel gas, or gasify all the coke to produce only fuel gas.
Please take a few minutes to answer the questions below before attempting to complete the assignments for this lesson. Click Check when you want to check your answers.
Each week, you will be required to do a number of assignments. This week, in addition to the reading assignments listed on the overview page, you are required to complete Exercise 5.
A coil visbreaker operates at 475°C for 1 min. How long will it take to achieve the same thermal severity at 440°C in a soaker visbreaking process? An apparent Arrhenius activation energy for thermal cracking is given as 45 kcal/mol. Show each step of calculations in your answer.
Once you have a solution to the exercises, you will submit your answers as a PDF by uploading your file to be graded. The MS Word, or Excel files should be saved as a PDF before submitting the exercise. Please Note: Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable.
Physical separation of crude oil was not sufficient to meet the demand for motor fuels that had increased significantly with the increasing number of automobiles. Thermal cracking was therefore introduced as the first conversion process to produce more distillate fuels from petroleum refining. Thermal cracking, starting typically with breaking the C-C bonds in alkanes, proceeds with free radical chain reactions. One of the common outcomes of thermal cracking is to make light or medium distillates from the heavier fractions of the crude oil. Visbreaking, a mild (low-severity) thermal cracking process, reduces the viscosity of the VDR by rejecting a small quantity of coke as deposits on reactor surfaces. The principal product of visbreaking from VDR is a heavy fuel oil. On the other end of the thermal conversion spectrum, coking, the most severe thermal cracking process, converts VDR to light distillates and gaseous products by rejecting carbon in large quantities in the form of petroleum coke. If the sulfur and metal contents of VDR are sufficiently low, the petroleum coke can be a valuable by-product that is used for producing anode coke for electrolysis of alumina to produce metallic aluminum.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 6! Double-check the to-do list on the Lesson 6 Overview page to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 7.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapter 5 |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 5: A coil visbreaker operates at 500°C for 1 min. How long will it take to achieve the same thermal severity at 450°C in a soaker visbreaking process? An apparent Arrhenius activation energy for thermal cracking is given as 50 kcal/mol. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Catalytic conversion processes became important in petroleum refining after the Second World War. Catalytic cracking has been developed to produce high yields of gasoline with high octane # from high-boiling stocks using catalysts. As different from thermal cracking, catalytic cracking.
One particular catalytic cracking process, Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC), has captured universal acceptance in the refining industry because of its feed flexibility, ability to modify product yields through minor changes in the process operating conditions. FCC is used to produce high-octane gasoline mainly from straight-run atmospheric gas oil and light vacuum gas oil (LVGO) [1]. This process involves breaking up long chains of n-alkanes into shorter chains of branched alkanes (isoalkanes), cycloalkanes (naphthenes), and aromatics by using acidic catalysts. In addition to high-octane gasoline, catalytic cracking produces LPG, cycle oils, and olefin-rich light hydrocarbons (C3, C4). The olefins are used as petrochemical feedstocks, or as reactants in alkylation and polymerization reactions, to produce higher molecular weight branched alkanes and olefins to contribute to the high-octane gasoline pool.
Hydrocracking processes have been introduced for upgrading heavier crude oil fractions such as heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) and vacuum distillation residue VDR. The heaviest fractions of crude oil, HVGO and VDR, may not be easily processed by FCC because of potential problems with excessive coking on the catalysts. For upgrading these high-boiling and aromatic-rich feedstocks, hydrogen is introduced in the hydrocracking process, along with bi-functional catalysts systems, to keep coking under control while upgrading the heavy fractions to light and middle distillates.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us less than one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignments page within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapters 7 (Catalytic Hydrocracking) and Chapter 8 (Hydroprocessing and Resid Processing) |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 6 Quiz 3. Will cover material in Lessons 6 and 7. Check the Syllabus, or Course Calendar for Quiz 3 schedule. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
As opposed to thermal cracking governed by free radicals, catalytic cracking proceeds through the formation of ionic species on catalyst surfaces, and produces shorter, but branched-chain (not straight-chain) alkanes by cracking the long straight-chain alkanes. The formation of branched-chain alkanes, or iso-alkanes, leads to the production of gasoline with high octane numbers. This is the fundamental reason why catalytic cracking has replaced thermal cracking as the central process in a refinery geared to maximize gasoline production. A high octane number of gasoline is needed for current spark-ignition engines to run at high compression ratios without knocking. High compression ratios in spark-ignition engines translate to high power and high efficiency.
Figure 7.1 introduces the two types of ionic species, carbocations, that are active in catalytic cracking reactions as carbenium, and carbonium ions, using the IUPAC terminology. Carbocations are the positively charged ions made from hydrocarbons. Figure 7.1 shows that removing a hydride ion (H-, a hydrogen atom with an additional electron) from an alkane (e.g., methane) produces carbenium ions (path 1a). Also, adding a proton (H+, a hydrogen atom without the electron) to an olefin (e.g., ethylene) can produce carbenium ions, as shown in path 1b.
Analogous to the terminology used for free radicals, C+H3 is called methyl carbenium ion, and C2+H5 is called an ethyl carbenium ion. Carbonium ions are produced by adding a proton to an alkane, say methane, as shown in Figure 7.1. The resulting ion C+H5 is called methanium. Note that there is some confusion in the literature about naming the carbocations. Carbenium ions used to be called carbonium ions in some sources, including your textbook [2]. All references to carbonium ions in Section 6.3 Cracking Reactions in the textbook should be corrected as carbenium ions.
Carbocations are formed from hydrocarbons on two different acid sites: Bronsted acid sites and Lewis acid sites. You should remember that Bronsted acid sites donate protons, while Lewis acid sites accept electrons to form carbocations from hydrocarbons. Figure 7.2 illustrates how an olefin (e.g., ethylene, C=C) produces an ethyl carbenium ion (C+2H5) by reacting with a proton donated from Bronsted acid site. Alternatively, also seen in Figure 7.2, a Lewis acid site accepts an electron (or a hydride ion, H-) from an alkane (e.g., ethane, C-C) to produce the same ethyl carbenium ion (C+2H5). These two reactions that take place on the acid sites of catalysts, along with the formation of carbonium ions by protonation of hydrocarbons on Bronsted sites, function as the initiation steps in the ionic chain reactions that lead to the products obtained from catalytic cracking.
Figure 7.3 compares the distribution of products from thermal cracking (free radical chain reactions) and catalytic cracking (ionic chain reactions). Short chain paraffins constitute the principal products in both cases, with one important difference – an abundance of iso-alkanes (branched-chain alkanes) in catalytic cracking products. One can also note in Figure 7.3 that catalytic cracking products contain higher concentration of aromatic compounds. High octane number of gasoline produced by catalytic cracking can be attributed to high concentrations of i-alkanes and relatively more abundant aromatics present in the crackate (catalytic cracking product). Having no olefins larger than butylene (C4) from catalytic cracking processes, also distinguishes catalytic cracking products from thermal cracking products obtained from gas oil.
Table 7.1 compares the products of thermal cracking and catalytic cracking of different type of hydrocarbons. Notably, high yields of C1 and C2 gaseous products (methane, ethane, and ethylene) from thermal cracking are contrasted with high yields of C3- C6, with small quantities of methane and essentially no olefins heavier than butylene, from catalytic cracking. Significant for the octane number of the gasoline fraction from the catalytic cracking of aliphatic hydrocarbons are the abundance of i-alkanes and significant concentration of aromatic compounds (BTX) that increase the octane number.
Hydrocarbons | Thermal Cracking | Catalytic Cracking |
---|---|---|
n-alkanes (e.g., C16) |
C2is major product C1in large quantities C4-C15olefins in moderate abundance |
C3-C6are major light prods C1in small quantities No olefins > C4 |
Aliphatic |
Little aromatization at 500ºC No branched – chain alkanes present |
Significant aromatization Abundance of branched – chain alkanes |
n-0lefins |
Slow double bond isomerization Little skeletal isomerization |
Rapid isomerization C=C–C–C→ C–C=C–C Rapid skeletal isomerization |
Alkylaromatics | ß – scission | |
Naphthenes | Crack more slowly than n-paraffins | Crack at comparable rates with n-paraffins |
As discussed in Lesson 6, the slow isomerization of free radicals (moving the unpaired electron from an edge atom to the interior atoms) results in the production of shorter straight-chain alkanes and straight-chain olefins in thermal cracking, thus leading to low octane numbers of the gasoline product. In contrast to free radicals, the isomerization of carbocations is very fast because of the thermodynamic driving force, shown in Table 7.2. One can see in Table 7.2 that the isomerization of a primary propyl carbenium ion to a secondary propyl carbenium ion releases (19.1- 1.5) = 17.6 kcal/mol. This is a very large thermodynamic driving force for the isomerization of a primary ion to a secondary ion, and further to a tertiary ion, with even a larger driving force. Isomerization of the secondary propyl ion to the tertiary propyl ion, releases 1.5 kcal/mol of energy. It is, therefore, clear that the initiation and propagation of carbocations in catalytic cracking chain reactions on the catalyst surfaces will be dominated by the formation of secondary and tertiary carbocations. The reactions of these carbocations lead to the formation of branched-chain alkanes and olefins with high octane numbers.
Carbenium Ions | ΔHf(relative) (kcal/mol) |
---|---|
C1+ primary |
19.1 |
C2+ secondary |
1.5 |
C3+ tertiary |
0 |
Another important feature of carbocation formation is the differences in the enthalpy of formation which favors the formation of carbocations > C3 versus C1 and C2 ions (Table 7.3), because C1 and C2 ions are primary ions. This explains the low yields of C1 and C2 species obtained from catalytic cracking.
Carbenium Ions | ΔHf(relative) (kcal/mol) |
---|---|
CH3⊕ | 258 |
C2H5⊕ | 225 |
n-C3H7⊕ | 218 |
i-C3H7⊕ | 198 |
n-C4H9⊕primary | 211 |
t-C4H9⊕ tertiary | 174 |
Figure 7.4 illustrates the ionic chain reactions that govern catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons. The initiation step includes the formation of a carbonium ion by proton donation from a Bronsted acid site and/or the formation of a carbenium ion through hydride ion abstraction by a Lewis acid site. In a propagation step, the carbonium ion goes through cracking to produce an alkane product and a carbenium ion, while the carbenium ion produced on the Lewis acid site goes through a β-scission to produce an olefin product and another carbenium ion. In additional propagation reactions, carbenium ions (secondary, or tertiary) react with alkanes to produce i-alkane products and other carbenium ions, which can go through isomerization reactions generating more stable ions. Finally, in termination steps, carbenium ions donate a proton to restore a Bronsted acid site and produce an olefin as final product, or they abstract a hydride ion to restore a Lewis acid site producing an i-alkane product, and the ionic chain reaction continues. Other reactions during catalytic cracking include dehydrocyclization and dehydrogenation reactions to produce aromatic compounds. One should note that thermal cracking reactions also take place during catalytic cracking because of the sufficiently high temperatures used in the process. Some claim that initial thermal cracking of alkanes to produce olefins should also be considered as an initiation step in ionic chain reactions [2].
Increasing demand for gasoline, along with the need to produce high-octane gasoline for increasingly more powerful spark ignition engines, led to the development and maturation of catalytic cracking processes just before and during World War II. Following the development of a fixed-bed (Houdry process, 1936) and a moving-bed (Thermafor Catalytic Cracking, 1941) catalytic cracking process, fluid-bed catalytic cracking (FCC, 1942) became the most widely used process worldwide because of the improved thermal efficiency of the process and the high product selectivity achieved, particularly after the introduction of crystalline zeolites as catalysts in the 1960s.
The list below shows a timeline for the development of the catalytic cracking processes. The evolution of catalytic cracking processes is an exemplary showcase in chemical engineering for discussing the advancement of reactor configuration, driven by energy conservation and process kinetics. The evolution of these processes is discussed in the following subsections.
McAfee (1915)
Batch reactor catalytic cracking to produce light distillates
Catalyst: A1Cl3 – A Lewis acid, electron acceptor
Alkane – electron(abstracted by A1Cl3)→ a carbocation(+)→ ionic chain reactions to crack long chains
Houdry (1936) - a commercial process
Continuous feedstock flow with multiple fixed-bed reactors
Cracking/catalyst regeneration cycles
Catalyst: clays, natural alumina/silica particles
Thermafor Catalytic Cracking (TCC) (1942)
Continues feedstock flow with moving-bed catalysts
Catalyst: synthetic alumina/silica particles
Higher thermal efficiency by process integration
Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) (1942)
Continuous feedstock flow with fluidized-bed catalysts
Catalyst: synthetic alumina/silica+zeolites (1965)
The first catalytic cracking process was developed as a batch process (McAfee, 1915) shortly after the development of a thermal cracking process. The process used Lewis acid catalysts (e.g., AlCl3) for cracking. These catalysts were expensive and corrosive. In addition to these impediments, use of a batch reactor in the McAfee process did not allow large-scale commercialization of this process. The first full-scale commercial process, the Houdry Catalytic Cracking, used much less expensive catalysts, such as clays, and natural alumina and silica particles. Figure 7.5 shows the configuration of the Houdry Catalytic Cracking process. For cracking, gas oil feed was heated to 800°F and fed to a fixed-bed reactor packed with the catalyst particles. Cracking products are sent to a fractionator to be separated into gas, gasoline, light cycle oil (LCO) and heavy cycle oil (HCO) products.
A series of swing reactors were needed to switch the feed flow from one reactor to another after approximately 10 minutes of operation. The switch to a swing reactor was necessary because of rapid coking on catalysts which, being natural materials, had a wide range of activity. Rapid coking on silica/alumina particles deactivated these catalysts and led to plugging of the reactors. After the flow was switched to another reactor, the isolated reactor was stripped with steam for five minutes to remove the liquid products adsorbed on catalyst particles. After stripping with steam, the deactivated catalysts were regenerated by burning off the coke on catalysts with hot air introduced to the reactor. Catalyst regeneration also takes approximately 5 minutes before the reactor with regenerated catalyst is ready to accept the feed again. By this time, the second reactor would be ready for the 10-minute cycle of steam stripping and catalyst regeneration. Having a third reactor in the plant would help deal with any delays/problems in reactor preparation. Considering that catalytic cracking is an endothermic process, the heat generated from burning the coke off the catalyst could be used partially to heat the catalyst particles for the endothermic reaction. A large portion of the heat in the flue gases from coke combustion was not available for the process. Therefore, the thermal efficiency of the Houdry Process was low.
Thermafor (also referred to as “thermofor” in some sources) Cracking Process was introduced for better integration of thermochemistry (endothermic cracking and exothermic catalyst regeneration) by introducing a moving-bed configuration, rather than a fixed-bed, as shown in Figure 7.6. Catalysts used in this process were synthetic alumina/silica beads that have more homogeneous and consistent properties (e.g., activity) than the natural minerals. Catalysts particles and the feed are introduced from the top of the reactor, and the catalyst particles move downward with gravity as the cracking reactions take place on the catalyst surfaces. Steam is injected from the bottom of the reactor to carry the cracking products to the fractionator for recovery. As the particles move down the reactor, they are deactivated by coke build-up on active sites. The deactivated catalysts removed from the bottom of the reactor are sent to a regenerator unit where the coke on catalysts surfaces are burned off and the heated catalysts particles are recycled to the top of the reactors by bucket elevators. Hot catalyst particles provide most of the heat necessary for the cracking reactions in the reactor. Although the thermal efficiency of TCC is higher than that of the Houdry process, there was still a significant amount of heat loss during the transport of heated catalyst particles by bucket elevators.
Fluid Catalytic Process, also introduced in 1942, offered an excellent integration of the cracking reactor and the catalyst regenerator that provides the highest thermal efficiency, as shown in Figure 7.7. In FCC, a fluidized-bed (or fluid-bed) of catalyst particles is brought into contact with the gas oil feed along with injected steam at the entrance (called the riser) of the reactor. The hot catalyst particles coming from the regenerator unit evaporate the feed gas oil upon contact in the riser, and the cracking starts as the gas oil vapors and the catalyst particles move upward in the reactor. The temperature of the catalyst particles drops as the evaporation of gas oil and endothermic cracking reactions proceed during the upward movement. Cracking reactions also deposit a significant amount of coke on the catalysts, leading to the deactivation of the catalyst. After removing the adsorbed hydrocarbons by steam stripping, the coked catalyst is sent to the regeneration unit to burn off the coke with air. Heat released from burning the coke deposit increases the temperature of the catalyst particles that are returned to the riser to complete the cycle. Burning off the rejected carbon (coke) in the regenerator provides the energy necessary for cracking without much loss, thus increasing the thermal efficiency of the process. The cracking products are sent to the fractionator for recovery after they are separated from the catalyst particles in the upper section of the reactor [3].
In the reactor, the cracking reactions initiate on the active sites of the catalysts with the formation of carbocations and the subsequent ionic chain reactions produce branched alkanes and aromatic compounds to constitute the crackate (cracked gasoline with high octane number), light olefins, cycle oils, and slurry oil that are sent to the fractionator. A carbon-rich byproduct of catalytic cracking, termed “coke,” deposits on catalyst surfaces and blocks the active sites. FCC is considered a carbon rejection process because the coke deposited on the catalyst surface and eventually burned off for heat is rich in carbon and thus enables the production of large quantities of a light distillate (crackate) in the process without the addition of hydrogen.
Two different configurations of the commercial FCC processes exist depending on the positions of the reactor and the regenerator: they can be side by side or stacked, where the reactor is mounted on top of the regenerator. Major licensor companies that offer FCC processes with different configurations include Kellogg Brown & Root, CB&I Lummus, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering, Shell Global Solutions International, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Institut Francais du Petrole (IFP), and UOP. Figure 7.8 shows examples of Exxon and UOP designs [1,4]. The UOP design of high-efficiency two-stage regenerator units offer advantages of uniform coke burn, higher conversion of CO to CO2 and lower NOx emissions among others. Another modification to FCC plants could be the installation of a catalyst cooler, which may provide better control of the catalyst/oil ratio; the ability to optimize the FCC operating conditions, increase conversions, and process heavier residual feedstocks; and better catalyst activity and catalyst maintenance [3].
In the first video below, the animation of an explosion in an FCC unit in 2015 (7:12 minute long) provides a good review of the FCC process, and points out the potential hazards of working with hydrocarbons exposed to high temperatures in refinery units:
One of the significant developments in FCC practice was the introduction of zeolite catalysts in 1965. Catalysts and additives play a major role in the selectivity and flexibility of FCC processes. FCC catalyst consists of a fine powder with an average particle size of 60–75 μm and a size distribution ranging from 20 to 120 μm. Four major components make up the catalysts: zeolite, active matrix, filler, and binder. Each of these constituents has a unique role to play, but zeolite is the key component that is more active and selective for high-octane number gasoline production [4]. Table 7.4 compares the octane numbers of some refinery products and FCC gasoline.
Product |
RON (600 rpm) |
MON (900 rpm) |
---|---|---|
Regular - Premium Gasoline | 90-100 | 80-90 |
Straight Run Gasoline | 60-68 | 60-68 |
FCC Gasoline (light) | 93 | 82 |
FCC Gasoline (heavy) | 95 | 85 |
Solve a problem on the material balance for the regenerator in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process.
Burning the coke deposited on the catalyst particles generates all the heat necessary for catalytic cracking. Therefore, the coke burning rate is a critical parameter to control the rate of cracking. The composition of dry flue gas from the regenerator of an FCC unit is given in vol% as follows:
N2: 81.6
CO2:15.7
CO: 1.5
O2: 1.2
The dry air flow rate to the regenerator is given as 593 SCMM (standard cubic meters per minute). Considering that a significant portion of coke is carbon, calculate the carbon burning rate in the regenerator in kg/min. Remember: 1 kgmole at STP = 22.4 m3)
Catalytic hydrocracking is one of the latest additions to petroleum refining processes, with the first modern commercial unit started up by Chevron in 1958. The interest in hydrocracking has been attributed to the increasing demand for light and middle distillates, the availability of byproduct hydrogen in large quantities from catalytic reforming, and the environmental regulations limiting sulfur and aromatic hydrocarbons in motor fuels [5]. The advantages of hydrocracking include its ability to handle a wide range of feedstocks that may be difficult to process by catalytic cracking and its flexibility in selectivity between light and middle distillates. The principal objective of hydrocracking is to decrease the molecular weight and boiling point of heavy oils to produce saturated hydrocarbons (diesel and jet fuel) from highly aromatic feedstocks (e.g., LCO from FCC) and distillation residua.
The hydrocracking process has two dimensions: Hydrogenation of aromatic rings and cracking of aliphatic compounds, as shown in Figure 7.10, using naphthalene as an example for an aromatic ring system. One should note that the aromatic rings cannot be cracked before they are saturated with hydrogen. With hydrocracking, it is possible to convert an aromatic compound to a paraffinic compound without any loss of carbon, as shown in Figure 7.10. As a hydrogen-addition process, hydrocracking provides high yields of valuable distillates without producing low-grade byproducts (e.g., heavy oils, gas, or coke) as experienced in carbon rejection processes such as coking.
The two different reaction systems in hydrocracking, hydrogenation and cracking, are supported by bifunctional catalyst formulations, as illustrated in Figure 7.11. Hydrogenation reactions are promoted by the metal component of the catalysts (e.g., Ni, Co, Mo), and the cracking takes place on catalyst support consisting of silica/alumina. Highly active noble metals (e.g., Pt, and Pd) can be used for hydrogenation of hydrocarbons with extremely low sulfur contents as the noble metals are susceptible to sulfur poisoning.
Hydrocracking processes most commonly include two reaction stages: Hydrotreating to remove heteroatom (S, N, O) species and Hydrocracking to increase the H/C ratio of the hydrocarbons in the feeds by hydrogenation and to decrease their molecular weight by cracking. In most cases, the hydrotreating reactor (HT) packed with cobalt-molybdenum catalysts precedes the hydrocracking (HC) reactor typically packed with nickel-tungsten catalysts (for hydrogenation) supported on alumina/silica (for cracking). Figure 7.12 shows different configurations of hydrocracking processes, depending on the heteroatom content of the feeds. For feeds with very low heteroatom contents, hydrocracking without hydrotreating may be applied, but this is very rare. Other process configurations include single stage with dual catalysts, two-stage dual and triple catalysts, as shown in Figure 7.11. The hydrocracking reactions are performed at 300–400°C and 8–15 MPa of hydrogen pressure.
In a refinery, hydrocracking complements catalytic cracking by taking on the more aromatic feedstocks that resist cracking, including the byproducts of FCC, such as light cycle oil (LCO). Hydrocracking can also be used to upgrade residual fractions using different reactor configurations and catalysts depending on the complexity of the upgrading tasks, as shown in Figure 7.12. As shown in Figure 7.13, for hydrocracking a relatively light feedstock (e.g., atmospheric residue), a fixed-bed configuration and relatively large-size catalyst particles can be used. In extreme cases with very heavy vacuum residue, an expanded bed configuration is used, in which very fine catalyst particles are entrained in the feed at high hydrogen pressures (high hydrogen/oil ratio). These extreme reaction conditions are necessary to prevent extensive coking on catalysts that could shut down the process. For intermediate cases, an ebullated (fluidized) bed configuration can be used, as shown in Figure 7.13.
In the United States, hydrocracking of LCO (from FCC) provides a large proportion of the diesel fuel production because straight-run LGO is a preferred stock for FCC to produce gasoline as the principal product. The major licensors of hydrocracking processes include Chevron, UOP, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering, BP, Shell, and BASF-IFP.
Catalytic Cracking - FCC | Hydrocracking |
---|---|
-carbon rejection -endothermic -acid catalyst -more gas -more coke |
-hydrogen addition -exothermic -metal catalyst on acid support -less gas -less coke -costly process ($$$) |
Above, we compare catalytic cracking (FCC - a carbon rejection process) with hydrocracking (HYDRCRC) with respect to the major attributes of both projects. Clearly, in a flexible refinery with a wide range of crude oil feedstocks, both processes are needed for the optimum conversion of the crude oil into desirable refinery products.
Please take a few minutes to answer the questions below. When you are satisfied with your responses, click Check My Answers to see how well you understood this lesson. These questions will help you study for the next quiz.
Exercise 6: Solve a problem on the material balance for the regenerator in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process.
Quiz 3. Will cover material in Lessons 6 and 7. Check the Syllabus, or Course Calendar for Quiz 3 schedule.
Solve a problem on the material balance for the regenerator in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process.
Burning the coke deposited on the catalyst particles generates all the heat necessary for catalytic cracking. Therefore, the coke burning rate is a critical parameter to control the rate of cracking. The composition of dry flue gas (excluding water) from the regenerator of an FCC unit is given in vol% as follows:
Gas | Volume % |
---|---|
N2 | 81.6 |
CO2 | 15.7 |
CO | 1.5 |
O2 | 1.2 |
The dry air (excluding moisture in the air) flow rate to the regenerator is given as 593 SCMM (standard cubic meters per minute). Considering that a significant portion of coke is carbon, calculate the carbon burning rate in the regenerator in kg/min. Remember: 1 kgmole at STP = 22.4 m3)
In previous offering of this course, I have noted a serious weakness in the students' understanding of how to carry out simple mass balances. Here a few reminders and hints to solve this problem:
Once you have a solution to the exercises, you will submit your answers as a PDF by uploading your file to be graded. The MS Word, or Excel files should be saved as a PDF before submitting the exercise. Please Note: Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable.
Catalytic processes constitute the core of the petroleum refineries to accomplish a number of conversion and finishing tasks. Catalytic cracking has been developed to produce high yields of gasoline with high octane # from high-boiling stocks using catalysts. Compared to thermal cracking, catalytic cracking takes place at lower temperatures and pressures and proceeds through carbocationic active species produced on acidic sites on catalyst surfaces. Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) has become a universal refining process because of its high efficiency and feed flexibility. This process involves breaking up long chains of n-alkanes into shorter chains of branched alkanes (isoalkanes), cycloalkanes (naphthenes), and aromatics in high yields. Although the main product from FCC is high-octane number gasoline, it also produces LPG, cycle oils, and olefin-rich light hydrocarbons (C3, C4). The olefins are used as petrochemical feedstocks, or as reactants in alkylation and polymerization reactions, to produce higher molecular weight branched alkanes and olefins to contribute to the high-octane gasoline pool. Hydrocracking processes have been introduced for upgrading heavier crude oil fractions such as heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) and vacuum distillation residue VDR. The heaviest fractions of crude oil, HVGO and VDR, may not be easily processed by FCC because of potential problems with excessive coking on the catalysts. For upgrading these high-boiling and aromatic-rich feedstocks, hydrogen is introduced in the hydrocracking process, along with bifunctional catalysts systems, to keep coking under control while upgrading the heavy fractions to light and middle distillates.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 7! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 8. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found within this lesson.
Readings | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapters 7 (Catalytic Hydrocracking) and Chapter 8 (Hydroprocessing and Resid Processing |
---|---|
Assignments | Exercise 6: The dry air flow rate to the regenerator is given as 593 SCMM (standard cubic meters per minute). Considering that a significant portion of coke is carbon, calculate the carbon burning rate in the regenerator in kg/min. Remember: (1 kgmole at STP = 22.4 m3). Quiz 3. Will cover material in Lessons 6 and 7. Check the Syllabus, or Course Calendar for Quiz 3 schedule. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Among the catalytic conversion processes developed just before and during the Second World War are included, in addition to catalytic cracking, polymerization processes that were introduced in the mid- to late 1930s, and alkylation and isomerization processes that were developed in the early 1940s. The principal impetus for developing these processes was to meet the demand for high-octane-number gasoline required by the high compression gasoline engines, including those used in the aircraft. Catalytic reforming and catalytic isomerization were developed in the 1950s to increase the high-octane-number gasoline yields from refineries. These processes are still important in current refineries that are directed to maximize gasoline yield from the crude oil feedstock. By-products from some of these processes, such as LPG and hydrogen, have gained significance because of the increasing demand in modern refineries for LPG recently used as automobile fuel and for hydrogen to supply the increasing demand for hydrotreating and hydrocracking processes.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found on the Assignments page within this lesson.
Readings: | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapters 10 (Catalytic Reforming and Isomerization)and 11(Alkylation and Polymerization) |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 7 |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Catalytic reforming converts low-octane, straight-run naphtha fractions, particularly heavy naphtha that is rich in naphthenes, into a high-octane, low-sulfur reformate, which is a major blending product for gasoline. The most valuable byproduct from catalytic reforming is hydrogen to satisfy the increasing demand for hydrogen in hydrotreating and hydrocracking processes. Most reforming catalysts contain platinum as the active metal supported on alumina, and some may contain additional metals such as rhenium and tin in bi- or tri-metallic catalyst formulations. In most cases, the naphtha feedstock needs to be hydrotreated before reforming to protect the platinum catalyst from poisoning by sulfur or nitrogen species. With the more stringent requirements on benzene and the total aromatics limit for gasoline in the United States and Europe, the amount of reformate that can be used in gasoline blending has been limited, but the function of catalytic reforming as the only internal source of hydrogen continues to be important for refineries.
Figure 8.1 locates the catalytic reforming process in a refinery. The feedstock for catalytic reforming is straight-run (directly from the crude oil) heavy naphtha that is separated in the naphtha fractionator of the Light Ends Unit, as discussed in Lesson 4. Light naphtha from the naphtha fractionator, inherently a low-octane-number fraction, can be sent directly to blending in gasoline pool after hydrotreating, if necessary, or sent to an isomerization process to increase its octane number. As discussed in Lesson 3, hydrotreating heavy naphtha is often necessary before catalytic reforming to protect the noble metal catalyst (e.g., Pt) used in the reforming process. The intended product from catalytic reforming is the high-octane-number reformate and the most significant by-product is hydrogen gas.
The general categories of the desired reactions in catalytic reforming are identified in the list below, along with the catalysts used in the process. Considering that the main purpose of the process is to increase the octane number of heavy naphtha, conversion of naphthenes to aromatics and isomerization of n-paraffins to i-paraffins are the most important reactions of interest. Under the right reaction conditions, aromatics in the feed, or those produced by dehydrogenation naphthenes, should remain unchanged. The reforming reactions produce large quantities of hydrogen, and one should remember that the dehydrogenation catalysts used in reforming can also catalyze hydrogenation and hydrocracking of aromatics during catalytic reforming. It is, therefore, important to keep these side reactions to a minimum by controlling the reactor conditions such as temperature and hydrogen pressure, as discussed in more detail later in this section.
The catalysts used in reforming contains platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), or, in some processes, bimetallic formulations of Pt with Iridium or Rhenium supported on alumina (Al2O3).
Reactions of Interest
Catalysts Used
Platinum catalyst on metal oxide support (platforming)
Pt/Al2O3
Bimetallic – Iridium or Rhenium
Pt-Re/Al2O3
The information above shows the ranges of composition for feedstock heavy naphtha and the reformate product (high-octane gasoline). Comparing the compositions of the feedstock and the product, one can see that the largest change in feedstock composition is a substantial increase in the aromatics content of the feedstock, with attendant decreases in naphthene and paraffin contents to constitute the product.
Feedstock: Heavy Naphtha Paraffins ⇒ 45-55% Naphthenes ⇒ 30-40% Aromatics ⇒ 5-10% |
Product: High Octane Gasoline Paraffins ⇒ 30-50% Naphthenes ⇒ 5-10% Aromatics ⇒ 45-60% |
Low severity (relatively low octane) → low paraffin conversion
High severity → high paraffin conversion
Lean naphtha → high n-paraffinic content - difficult to process
Rich naphtha → low n-paraffinic (high naphthene) content - easy to process
The information above also defines some specific terms for catalytic reforming related to the feedstock composition (lean, or rich naphtha), or to the extent of n-paraffin conversion in the process (low-, or high-severity). One could conclude from these terms that reforming of heavy naphtha that contains higher n-paraffin content requires more severe conditions in the reactor.
Figure 8.2 illustrates more specifically the desirable chemical reactions of catalytic reforming, including:
All of these reactions significantly increase the octane number (research octane number [RON] from 75 to 110 in Reaction 1, from 91 through 83 [cyclohexane] to 100 in Reaction 2, from 0 to 110 in Reaction 3, and from –19 to 90 in Reaction 4).
Reaction conditions that promote the desirable reactions are also listed in Figure 8.2. As can be seen in Figure 8.2, aromatic compounds and large quantities of by-product H2 are produced in the highly endothermic Reactions 1–3. High temperatures, low hydrogen pressures, low space velocity (SV), and low H2/HC ratio strongly promote the conversion in Reaction 1-3. Although maintaining a low hydrogen pressure is needed for promoting equilibrium conversion in Reactions 1-3, it is, however, necessary to maintain a sufficiently high hydrogen pressure in the reactors to inhibit coke deposition on the catalyst surfaces.
Hydrocracking is an undesired side reaction in catalytic reforming because it consumes hydrogen and decreases the reformate yield by producing gaseous hydrocarbons. Hydrocracking reactions are exothermic, but they can still be kinetically favored at high temperatures, and favored, obviously, by high hydrogen pressures. Below lists the heat of reactions for catalytic reforming reactions. Typically, reformers operate at pressures from 50 to 350 psig (345–2415 kPa), a hydrogen/feed ratio of 3–8 mol H2/mol feed, and liquid hourly space velocities of 1–3 h-1[1]. These conditions are chosen to promote the desired conversion reactions and inhibit hydrocracking while limiting coke deposition on the catalyst surfaces.
Hydrocracking
n-C10+H2 → n-C6+n-C4
to inhibit this reaction, use
Catalytic reformers are normally run at low H2 pressure to inhibit hydrocracking!
Heats of Reactions:
paraffin to naphthene → 44 kJ/mol H2 - endothermic
naphthenes to aromatics → 71 kJ/mol H2 - endothermic
hydrocracking → -56 kJ/mol H2 - exothermic
A reaction network for catalytic reforming is shown in Figure 8.3 [2], indicating the role of metallic (M) and the acidic (A) sites on the support in catalyzing the chemical reactions. The surfaces of metals (e.g., Pt) catalyze dehydrogenation reactions, whereas the acid sites on the support (e.g., alumina) catalyze isomerization and cracking reactions. Metal and acid sites are involved in the catalysis of hydrocracking reactions. Achieving the principal objective of catalytic reforming—high yields and high quality of reformate—can be achieved, to a large extent, by controlling the activity of the catalysts and the balance between acidic and metallic sites to increase the selectivity to desirable reactions in the reaction network.
Even in the presence of hydrogen during reforming reactions, catalysts are deactivated by coke deposition. Commercial catalytic cracking processes are classified based on how catalysts are regenerated, as shown below, as semi-regenerative, cyclic, and continuous reforming processes. The first commercial catalytic reforming process was introduced by UOP in 1949 as the PlatformingTM process that used three fixed-bed reactors. Figure 8.4 (on next page), shows a process with two reactors. The reactors operate in series with furnaces placed before each reactor to heat the feedstock and the reactor effluents to 500–530°C before entering each reactor because the predominant reforming reactions are highly endothermic. These units, called “semi-regenerative catalytic reformers,” need to be shut down once every 6–24 months for the in-situ regeneration of catalysts that are deactivated by coke deposition. Later designs included an extra reactor (a swing reactor) to enable isolation of one reactor at a time to undergo catalyst regeneration, whereas the other three reactors are running (Cyclic). This configuration enables longer on-stream times (up to 5 years) before scheduled shutdowns for catalyst regeneration, but it has not become popular. In the HYSYS Project 2, you will be comparing the performance of the three different configurations of catalytic reforming processes.
Catalytic Reforming Processes Based on Catalyst Regeneration
Licenced Processes (differences in catalysts and reactor configurations)
A continuous catalyst regeneration (CCR) scheme for reforming came on stream in 1971. Figure 8.5 shows a flow diagram for the CCR process. The reactors are stacked with a moving bed of catalyst trickling from the top reactor to the bottom reactor by gravity. Partially deactivated catalyst from the bottom of the reactor stack is continuously withdrawn and transferred to the CCR regenerator. The regenerated catalyst is re-injected to the top of the first reactor to complete the catalyst circulation cycle. Hydrotreated naphtha feed is combined with recycled hydrogen gas and heat exchanged with the reactor effluent. The combined feed is then raised to the reaction temperature in the charge heater and sent to the first reactor section. Because the predominant reforming reactions are endothermic, an inter-reactor heater is used to reheat the charge to the desired reaction temperature before it is introduced to the next reactor. The effluent from the last reactor is heat exchanged with the combined feed, cooled, and separated into vapor and liquid products in a separator.
The vapor phase is rich in hydrogen gas, and a portion of the gas is compressed and recycled back to the reactors. Recycling hydrogen is necessary to suppress coking on the catalysts. The hydrogen-rich gas is compressed and charged together with the separator liquid phase to the product recovery section. The performance of the unit (i.e., steady reformate yield and quality) depends strongly on the ability of the CCR regenerator to completely regenerate the catalyst. In addition to UOP’s Platforming process, the major commercial catalytic reforming processes include PowerformingTM (ExxonMobil), UltraformingTM and MagnaformingTM (BP), Catalytic Reforming (Engelhard), Reforming (IFP), and RheniformingTM (Chevron).
The alkylation process combines light iso-paraffins, most commonly isobutane, with C3–C4 olefins, to produce a mixture of higher molecular weight iso-paraffins (i.e., alkylate) as a high-octane number blending component for the gasoline pool. Iso-butane and C3–C4 olefins are produced as by-products from FCC and other catalytic and thermal conversion processes in a refinery. The alkylation process was developed in the 1930s and 1940s to initially produce high-octane aviation gasoline, but later it became important for producing motor gasoline because the spark ignition engines have become more powerful with higher compression ratios that require fuel with higher octane numbers. With the recent restrictions on benzene and the total aromatic hydrocarbon contents of gasoline by environmental regulations, alkylation has gained favor as an octane number booster over catalytic reforming. Alkylate does not contain any olefinic or aromatic hydrocarbons.
Alkylation reactions are catalyzed by strong acids (i.e., sulfuric acid [H2SO4] and hydrofluoric acid [HF]) to take place more selectively at low temperatures of 70°F for H2SO4 and 100°F for HF. By careful selection of the operating conditions, a high proportion of products can fall in the gasoline boiling range with motor octane numbers (MONs) of 88–94 and RONs of 94–99 [15]. Early commercial units used H2SO4, but more recently, HF alkylation has been used more commonly in petroleum refineries. HF can be more easily regenerated than H2SO4 in the alkylation process, and HF alkylation is less sensitive to temperature fluctuations than H2SO4 alkylation [3]. In both processes, the volume of acid used is approximately equal to the volume of liquid hydrocarbon feed. Important operating variables include acid strength, reaction temperature, iso-butane/olefin ratio, and olefin space velocity. The reactions are run at sufficiently high pressures to keep the hydrocarbons and the acid in the liquid phase. Good mixing of acid with hydrocarbons is essential for high conversions.
Some examples of desired alkylation reactions (combination of iso-paraffins with olefins) are given in Figure 8.6. These occur through ionic chain reactions (Figure 8.7) initiated by donation of a proton from the acid catalyst to an olefin to produce a carbocation that reacts with iso-butane to form a tert-butyl cation. Subsequent propagation reactions involve the reactions of a tert-butyl cation with olefins to form larger iso-paraffin cations that lead to final products through reactions with iso-butane to form a new tert-butyl cation to sustain the chain reaction [3]. The alkylation reaction is highly exothermic; therefore, cooling the reactor contents during alkylation is important.
Figure 8.8 shows a flow diagram for a UOP HF alkylation process [4]. Olefin and iso-butane feed streams are dried to remove water before they are mixed with the iso-butane recycle stream. The mixture is fed to the reactor, where it is highly dispersed into an incoming stream of acid catalyst. Conversion of reactants to high-quality alkylate takes place quickly, and the mixture flows up to the settling zone. In the settler, the catalyst is separated out as a bottom phase and flows, by gravity, through the catalyst cooler and returns to the reactor. The hydrocarbon phase from the settler, which contains propane, recycled iso-butane, normal butane, and alkylate, is charged to the main fractionator. High-purity propane is sent overhead to pass through the HF- propane stripper, de-fluorinator, and potassium hydroxide (KOH) treater before it is recovered. Recycled iso-butane is drawn from the side of the fractionator and returned to the entrance of the reactor after it is mixed with the dried olefin and isobutane feed. The n-butane product is taken from the side of the fractionators as vapor, condensed and KOH- treated before recovery. The alkylate product is obtained from the bottom of the fractionator. The HF catalyst is regenerated onsite in the regeneration section, where heavy oils (tars) are removed from the catalyst.
Transporting and working with concentrated acids pose safety risks. In particular, HF tends to form a vapor cloud that is difficult to disperse. The major licensor of the HF alkylation processes is UOP, whereas ExxonMobil and Stratford Engineering Corporation license H2SO4 alkylation processes. A newly designed alkylation process by UOP uses a solid catalyst called Alkylene®. Advantages of this new process over traditional HF alkylation processes (liquid acid technology) include no acid transportation, no acid spills, no corrosion, and reduced maintenance cost. Efforts to develop alternative processes that use solid acid catalysts instead of concentrated HF and H2SO4 for alkylation are underway.
The polymerization process combines propenes and butenes to produce higher olefins with high-octane numbers (97 RON and 83 MON) for the gasoline pool. The polymerization process was used extensively in the 1930s and 1940s, but it was replaced to a large extent by the alkylation process after World War II. It has gained favor after phasing out the addition of tetraethyl lead (TEL) to gasoline, and the demand for unleaded gasoline has increased. Typical polymerization reactions are shown in Figure 8.9 [5].
The most commonly licensed polymerization process is the UOP polymerization process, which uses phosphoric acid as catalyst. IFP licenses a Dimersol® process that produces dimers from propene or butene using a homogeneous aluminum alkyl catalyst.
Isomerization processes have been used to isomerize n-butane to iso-butane used in alkylation and C5 /C6 n-paraffins in light naphtha to the corresponding iso-paraffins to produce high-octane number gasoline stocks after the adoption of lead-free gasoline. Catalytic isomerization processes that use hydrogen have been developed to operate under moderate conditions. Typical feedstocks for the isomerization process include hydrotreated light straight-run naphtha, light natural gasoline, or condensate. The fresh C5/C6 feed combined with make-up and recycled hydrogen is directed to a heat exchanger for heating the reactants to reaction temperature. Hot oil or high-pressure steam can be used as the heat source in this exchanger. The heated feed is sent to the reactor. Typical isomerate product (C5+) yields are 97 wt% of the fresh feed, and the product octane number ranges from 81 to 87, depending on the flow configuration and feedstock properties.
Before attempting to take the quiz this week, spend a few minutes answering the questions below. Make sure to click Check to see how well you understand the content.
Each week, you will have a number of assignments. This week's assignments are listed below with instructions on how and where to submit them. For due dates, please check your syllabus.
Burning the coke deposited on the catalyst particles generates all the heat necessary for catalytic cracking. Therefore, the coke burning rate is a critical parameter to control the rate of cracking. The composition of dry flue gas from the regenerator of an FCC unit is given in vol% as follows:
GasVolume %
N281.6
CO215.7
CO 1.5
O2 1.2
The dry air flow rate to the regenerator is given as 593 SCMM (standard cubic meters per minute). Considering that a significant portion of coke is carbon, you calculated in Exercise 6 the carbon burning rate in the regenerator as 52.6 kg/min.
For this exercise, calculate the coke burning rate in kg/min and the hydrogen content (wt%) of the coke burnt. Assume that the coke consists only of carbon and hydrogen.
Hint: Use an oxygen balance to determine the missing oxygen which was consumed to burn the hydrogen in coke. Water content of the flue gas is not given because only the dry gas analysis is reported.
Note: The assumption that “coke consists only of carbon and hydrogen” may be justified for gas oil feedstock that is virtually free of sulfur and other heteroatom species. For high sulfur feeds, sulfur content of the burnt coke can also calculated from the dry flue gas analysis.
Once you have a solution to the exercises, you will submit your answers as a PDF by uploading your file to be graded. The MS Word, or Excel files should be saved as a PDF before submitting the exercise. Please Note: Scans of handwritten pages are not acceptable.
Catalytic reforming, alkylation and polymerization processes aim at increasing the yield of high-octane-number gasoline in the refineries. Catalytic reforming uses naphthene-rich, straight-run heavy naphtha as feedstock and produces a high-octane number reformate for the gasoline blending pool in a refinery. Principal catalytic reactions that take place on noble metals (e.g., Pt) and on acidic catalyst supports (e.g., Al2O3) produce high yields of aromatic hydrocarbons and i-alkanes, respectively, to result in a high-octane number product. A valuable by-product from catalytic reforming is hydrogen gas for which the demand is increasing in the refineries, particularly for finishing processes, such as hydrotreatment. Alkylation and polymerization reactions take shorter chains of C3, C4 alkanes and olefins and combine them to get branched C7, C8 alkanes in alkylate, and polymerate, respectively, to increase the yield of high-octane gasoline. Isomerization processes convert n-butane to i-butane to be used as feed in alkylation processes, or isomerize n-C5 and n-C6 to the corresponding i-alkane to produce, again, high-octane-number gasoline stock.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 8! Double-check the to-do list in the table below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 9. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found within this lesson.
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Readings: | J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, Mark J. Kaiser, Chapters 10 (Catalytic Reforming and Isomerization)and 11(Alkylation and Polymerization) |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 7 |
Following our discussion on separation and conversion processes, this lesson will cover the third type of refining processes – finishing processes. Finishing processes include hydrogenation for stabilization of petroleum products, hydrotreating to remove heteroatoms (S, N, and metals) and product blending to attain the product specifications and assure compliance with environmental and government regulations on petroleum fuels and materials. The finishing step is the last stage before the hydrocarbon streams from different units leave the refinery as commercial fuels and materials. Therefore, the challenges involved both hydrotreatment and blending operations are diverse and complex. The constraints on the commercial fuels that need to be satisfied simultaneously range from composition and performance specifications to seasonal fluctuations in demand for different fuels and materials. A brief overview of only the basic concepts in finishing operations is presented in this lesson.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found in this lesson.
Readings: | Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Chapter 9 (Hydrotreating) and Chapter 12 (Product Blending) |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 8 Exam 2. Will cover material in Lessons 6-9. Exam 2 is found in the Exam 2 Module. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion Forum (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Hydrogenation, or adding hydrogen to unsaturated hydrocarbons, is used for stabilization of petroleum products and aromatic reduction [1]. One particular application of hydrogenation is to saturate unstable olefins and di-olefins that are implicated in producing gums (high-molecular-weight sticky semi-solid material) during the storage of fuels, such as gasoline and jet fuel. Gum formation is detrimental, particularly, to the operation of fuel injectors in combustion engines. Narrow passages found in fuel injectors can be partially or completely plugged with deposition/accumulation of gums on flow surfaces, causing engine failures. Figure 9.1 on the next page shows examples of hydrogenation of an aromatic compound (alkylated naphthalene) and an olefin. The objective of hydrogenation is just adding hydrogen to unsaturated hydrocarbons using precious metal (Pt, Pd) or Ni catalysts at low temperatures to avoid cracking or other chemical changes.
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 9, Hydrotreatment, pp. 195-203.
As a natural substance, crude oil contains heteroatom (S, N, and O) compounds as well as metals (mainly Ni and V) in addition to hydrocarbons. The sulfur content of crude oils normally ranges from 0.05 to 6 wt %, nitrogen content varies from 0.1 to 1 wt %, oxygen from 0.1 to 2.0 wt %, and metals from 10 to 1000 ppm. Once crude is fractionated by distillation, the heteroatoms (particularly S, N, and metal compounds) are distributed in the products. Heteroatom compounds are mainly associated with the higher boiling fractions and the residues that are rich in aromatic compounds. The presence of heteroatom compounds in petroleum products is undesirable because they reduce fuel stability, contribute to the emission of pollutants, and damage engines. Heteroatom compounds in refinery streams (e.g., basic nitrogen compounds, sulfur compounds, and metals) can deactivate catalysts and promote coke formation [2].
The light products such as LPG and naphthas have low concentrations of sulfur and require minimal treatment, such as absorption in alkaline solvents (e.g., H2S or mercaptan sulfur) or conversion of mercaptans to sulfides to eliminate odor. For example, the UOP MeroxTM process is widely used to remove H2S and mercaptan sulfur (Merox extraction) or to convert mercaptan sulfur to less-objectionable disulfides (Merox sweetening) [2]. The Merox process can be used to treat liquids such as LPG, naphtha, and kerosene. Removing sulfur from higher molecular weight and more complex molecules requires hydrotreatment processes that use hydrogen.
[2] S. Eser and M. R. Riazi, “Crude Oil Refining Processes” In Petroleum Refining and Natural Gas Processing, Editors: M. R. Riazi, S. Eser, J. L. Peña, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, p. 119.
Desulfurization of fuels is commonly achieved by catalytic hydrodesulfurization (HDS), in which the organic sulfur species are converted to H2S and the corresponding hydrocarbon, as in the following reaction: R-SH + H2 → R-H + H2S. Here R represents an alkyl group, such as methyl (CH3–), or ethyl (C2H5–). Figure 9.2 shows the type and relative reactivity of different sulfur species in HDS reactions. The reactivity of R-SH (mercaptan, or thiol) compounds is higher than that of disulfides (R-S-S-R). The H2S is easily removed from the desulfurized oil by absorption in a gas treatment unit and subsequently converted to elemental sulfur by the Claus process, as will be discussed in Lesson 10.
Some HDS reactions are shown in Figure 9.3. Note that the objective of hydrotreatment reactions is to take the heteroatom out with minimum hydrogen consumption. The ideal scenario is to get the hydrogen atoms to break the carbon-sulfur bonds and to remove sulfur as H2S. This may not always be possible because of problems with the accessibility of sulfur atoms to hydrogen atoms. Sulfur ring compounds such as methylated dibenzothiophenes have the lowest reactivity in HDS reactions because they are planar compounds, and in some methylated DBTs the S atom is shielded by the methyl groups (See Figure 9.4). Removing sulfur from these compounds requires more hydrogen consumption in order to saturate the aromatic rings in dibenzothiophene (DBT) to form non-planar compounds. Remember that, as opposed to aromatic compounds, cycloalkanes are not planar compounds. Therefore, saturation of the aromatic rings in methylated DBTs eliminates the steric hindrance (shielding) of methyl groups to make the S atom accessible to active sites on the catalyst surface for removal as H2S. The geometry of this proposition is better understood when one looks at the configuration of active sites on the HDS catalysts shown in Figure 9.5.
The HDS catalysts consist of sulfided molybdenum supported on Al2O3. Sulfided molybdenum surfaces have vacancies (with missing S atom in the sequence) that act as active sites on the catalyst surface (Figure 9.5). In addition to Mo, HDS catalysts also contain other metals, such as cobalt (Co) as promoters, the main function of which is believed to dissociate H2 to atomic species that readily react with S. The HDS mechanism involves inviting the sulfur atom at the HDS target to sit in the vacancy and once the S is in the vacancy, dispatching H atoms to clip C-S atoms to make H2S that will leave the vacancy and make it available for the next action. You can see that this scenario would get into trouble if S cannot sit in the vacancy, as would happen with the compound 4,6 dimethyldibenzothiophene (Figure 9.4 on the previous page and Figure 9.5 below). This calls for saturating the aromatic rings to twist the methyl groups aside to make the S atom fit in the vacancy to be taken away as H2S. The list below lists the relative HDS reactivities of methylated DBT compounds relative to HDS of unsubstituted DBT.
One can see above that the HDS reactivity of 4,6 dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6 dimethylDBT) is one-tenth of unsubstituted dibenzothiophene (DBT), because of the shielding of the S atom by methyl groups as discussed above. Moving the methyl groups away from the sulfur atom to 3,7 positions (See Figure 9.4) increases the HDS reactivity 15- fold to 1.5 times of DBT. Interestingly, having methyl groups away from the S atom (as in 3,7 and 2,8 positions) increases the HDS reactivity relative to that of DBT. Methyl substitution on DBT away from the S atom increases the HDS reactivity by promoting adsorption of the compounds on the catalyst surface and may weaken the C-S bonds on DMDBTs. In contrast, even one methyl group shielding the S atom (4-methyldibenzothiphene in list above) reduces the reactivity of the methylatedDBT to one-fifth of the reactivity of DBT.
Hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) is a similar process to HDS in which hydrogen is used to remove nitrogen, and for this reason during HDS the nitrogen content of fuels is also reduced. Figure 9.6 shows different types of nitrogen-containing compounds in crude oil and refinery unit products. In addition to reducing the N content in fuels as a finishing process, basic nitrogen compounds such as pyridine and quinoline shown in Figure 9.6 should also be removed as a pretreatment step to protect the acidic catalysts used in processes such as FCC. This is similar to HDS being an important pretreatment process for feedstocks that would be exposed to noble metal catalysts (such as Pt in a catalytic reforming process) that are poisoned by sulfur compounds. Figure 9.7 shows examples of HDN reactions and catalysts used for HDN. Similar to HDN reactions for quinoline, shown in Figure 9.7, pyridine (C5H5N) can be reduced to pentane (C5H12) and ammonia (NH3) by adding 5 molesH2 in three steps. The overall HDN reaction for pyridine is C5H5N + 5H2 → C5H12 + NH3.
Similar to HDS and HDN, hydrodemetallation (HDM) is carried out: 1) as a pretreatment operation to remove metals (mostly nickel and vanadium) to protect the catalysts in subsequent conversion reactions, and 2) for removing metals in petroleum fuels to prevent corrosion in furnaces and toxic emissions from combustion engines. As mentioned in Lesson 1, metals (Ni, V) are mostly incorporated in the cage-like structures of highly stable organometallic compounds called porphyrins. As seen in Figure 9.8, to remove the metals, the cage structure of porphryins needs to be broken up. Similar to HDS and HDN, hydrotreatment on a Mo/Al2O3 catalyst first breaks up the chemical bonds in porphyrins to free the metals. The metals are then reacted with H2S and precipitated as metal sulfides, e.g., NixSy, on catalyst surfaces. Note that this is different from HDS and HDN where the heteroatoms are removed as gas (H2S and NH3, respectively). [Think: What would be the significance of removing metals as metal sulfides as far as the morphology of the HDM catalysts is concerned? Save your answer for the Self-Check question later in this lesson. ] Metals Ni and V deposited on the catalysts can be recovered by post treatment of the used catalysts.
In addition to HDS, HDM, and HDN, there may be a need for hydrodeoxygenation and hydrodehalogenation processes to remove O, or Cl in petroleum products [1].
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 9, Hydrotreatment, pp. 195-203.
Process objectives, conditions, and configurations are similar for all hydrotreatment processes [1]. As an example, HDS list, below, lists the project objectives and selected conditions for HDS processes. Minimization of cracking (or any other chemical change that is not needed for removing heteroatoms) and minimization of hydrogen consumption are the two principal objectives of hydrotreatment processes for reducing the heteroatom concentrations to the desired levels in the reaction products. These objectives are achieved by careful selection of process conditions that need to be adjusted based on the chemical composition of the feedstock. You can see in HDS list, that more severe reaction conditions (e.g., higher reaction temperatures, higher hydrogen/feed ratios, and lower space velocities) are necessary for treating heavy residue compared to treating light distillates. Catalysts have shorter lives in residue treatment processes, as well, because of harsh reaction conditions and more excessive deposition on catalysts during the treatment of heavy residue.
Objectives
Process Conditions |
Light Distillate |
Heavy Residue |
Temperature,&;ºC |
300-400 |
340-425 |
LHSV, h-1 | 2-10 | 0.2-1 |
H2/Oil, scf/bbl | 300-2000 | 2000-10000 |
Catalyst life, years | 10 | ~1 |
Note: LHSV (Liquid Hourly Space Velocity) – the volumetric flow rate of liquid reactant passing through a reactor divided by the volume of the catalyst in the reactor, measured in units of h-1. Lower LHSV (i.e., longer exposure to catalyst in the reactor) is needed for more challenging hydrotreatment tasks.
Figure 9.9 shows a process flow diagram for HDS. The feed is introduced into a fixed-bed catalytic reactor along with hydrogen, and the products are sent to a high-pressure separator to separate H2 and H2S gases from the hydrocarbons. The gases are sent to a scrubber with a basic solution (containing ethanol amine or diethanol amine) to remove H2S that is sent to the sulfur recovery unit and H2 is recycled to the treatment reactor. Desulfurized products are sent to a fractionator to separate C3 and C4 alkanes (LPG) and the liquid products.
For HDS, HDN and HDM sequential reactors can be configured with different catalysts optimized for the targeted heteroatom removal. Figure 9.10 shows staging of the HDM and HDS operations. The first step in a series of reactors is always HDM because of the unique removal mechanism of the metals (Ni and V), as solid materials on catalyst surfaces, catalysts with large pores in the support materials are needed so that the problems with reactor plugging can be avoided. Following the removal of metals, HDS and HDN can be conducted on medium-pore and small-pore catalysts, in some cases simultaneously in the same reactor or the same catalyst bed.
Increasing sulfur contents of the crude oils available for the U.S. refineries on one hand, and decreasing sulfur contents of regulated fuels on the other, have increased the sulfur production in the U.S. refineries as a by-product to 40,000 tons/day [4]. This is sufficient capacity to meet all sulfur demand for the chemical industry, particularly for H2SO4 production used in many chemical industries. One should note that this quantity of sulfur comes only from desulfurization of the fuels that are subject to sulfur regulation. A significant fraction of sulfur in crude oil (>60%) is concentrated in the heavy ends (e.g., residual fuel oil, asphalt) that are not regulated for sulfur content.
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 9, Hydrotreatment, pp. 195-203.
[4] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 12, Product Blending, pp.257-270.
Product blending plays a key role in preparing the refinery products for the market to satisfy the product specifications and environmental regulations. The objective of product blending is to assign all available blend components to satisfy the product demand and specifications to minimize cost and maximize overall profit [5]. Almost all refinery products are blended for the optimal use of all of the intermediate product streams for the most efficient and profitable conversion of petroleum to marketable products. For example, typical motor gasolines may consist of straight-run naphtha from distillation, crackate (from FCC), reformate, alkylate, isomerate, and polymerate, in proportions to make the desired grades of gasoline and the specifications.
Basic intermediate streams can be blended into different finished products. For example, naphthas can be blended into gasoline, or jet fuel streams, depending on the demand. Until the 1960s, the blending was performed in batch operations. With computerization and the availability of the required equipment, online blending operations have replaced blending in batch processes. Keeping inventories of the blending stocks along with cost and physical data has increased the flexibility of and profits from online blending through optimization programs. In most cases, the components blend nonlinearly for a given property (e.g., vapor pressure, octane number, cetane number, viscosity, pour point), and correlations and programming are required for reliable predictions of the specified properties in the blends [3].
[3] U.S. Refinery Sulfur Production Capacity [14]
[5] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 12, Product Blending, p.267.
Octane numbers are blended on a volumetric basis using the blending octane numbers of the components. True octane numbers do not blend linearly, thus it is necessary to use blending octane numbers in calculating the octane number of the blend. Blending octane numbers can be estimated from empirical correlations that have been developed over the years. Blending octane numbers, when added on a volumetric average basis, will give the true octane of the blend, as can be obtained from standard test using CFR test engines.
(True Octane Number of a blend) ON = Σ xi∗ ONi
Where xi is the volume fraction of component i in the blend, and ONi is the blending octane number of component i.
For example, if you have
and would like to get a gasoline of ON = 83, what would be the volume fraction of reformate (x) in the blend?
So, you need 73% by volume of reformate in your blend. Additive concentration may be calculated the same way, and ON for multicomponent blends can be calculated the same way for research or motor octane numbers.
Pour point is an important property for diesel and fuel oil blends. Pour point blending is also non-linear, and pour point blending indices were developed to enable reliable calculation of the pour points of the blends. Pour point blending indices for some distillate fuels are given in Table 12.7 of the textbook, and copied in Figure 9.11, where the blending indices are tabulated as a function of ASTM 50% temperature, °F (first horizontal listing) and Pour Point, °F (first vertical listing). For example, pour point blending index for a distillate that has an ASTM 50% temperature of 500°F and a pour point of 40°F would be 36. This index can be used in calculating the pour point of blends using this distillate as a component.
As an example of using blending indices to calculate the pour point of a blend, consider blending a straight-run gas oil (50% ASTM T = 470°F and pour point = -6°F) and a hydrotreated heavy gas oil (50% ASTM T = 620°F and pour point = 40°F). What would be the pour point of a binary blend that consists of 68.7 % vol of straight-run gas oil and 31.3% vol of hydrotreated heavy gas oil?
The procedure used to calculate the pour point of the blend (shown Figure 9.12) can be summarized as follows:
Note that if you would assume linear addition of the pour points, you would calculate a blend pour point as = 0.687x(-6) +0.313x40 = 8.4°F. A serious underestimation of the pour point! Thinking that your diesel fuel has a pour point 8.4 °F, you may try to start your diesel truck on a 12°F day, to no avail, not knowing that your fuel tank has a gel, and not a liquid that can be easily pumped to the combustion cylinder.
Similar to pour point, the viscosity of blends can also be calculates using blending index numbers, or plots developed for this purpose. For the same blend, we can use the Viscosity Blending Index Numbers in Table 12. 3. of your textbook [6], and the procedure shown in Figure 9.13 to calculate the viscosity of the blend. Try to verify the numbers given in Figure 9.13, and calculate a viscosity of the blend if viscosities were linearly additive to compare with the value calculated in Figure 9.13. Post your questions, if any, and comments in the Help Discussion Forum.
[6] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 12, Product Blending, p.263.
Please take a few minutes to answer the questions below. When you are happy with your answers, click Check.
The assignments for this week are listed below. Please be aware that you have an exam next week!
Exam 2 (eTest). Will cover material in Lessons 6-9. Check the Syllabus, or Course Calendar for Exam 2 schedule and venue.
Finishing processes make sure that the refinery products fully comply with the commercial specifications and environmental regulations. Hydrotreatment removes heteroatoms from intermediate refinery products to protect the catalysts in the subsequent processes, or from final products to be sent out to the market. A particular challenge for hydrotreatment is that while the crude oil slate is getting more contaminated, the demand for cleaner fuels is mandated by the increasingly stringent environmental regulations. Major hydrotreatment processes include hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrogenation, and hydrodemetallation, all using hydrogen and specially designed catalysts to remove heteroatoms with minimal change to the hydrocarbon constitution of petroleum products. Product blending as a major finishing process takes up the challenge of the optimum allocation of many intermediate streams in the refinery to make up the refinery products to satisfy all performance parameters and environmental mandates. Product blending is carried out using linear and non-linear programming techniques for online blending.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 9! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 10.
Readings: | Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Chapter 9 (Hydrotreating) and Chapter 12 (Product Blending) |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 8 Exam 2. Will cover material in Lessons 6-9. Exam 2 is found in the Exam 2 Module. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion Forum (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
The fourth type of refining processes constitutes the supporting processes. Figure 10.1 lists the supporting role of these processes as:
Although these processes and units are not involved directly in hydrocarbon fuels production, their roles are essential for the operation of a refinery.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found in this lesson.
Reading: | J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Chapter 13 (Supporting Processes) |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 9 |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
The gas streams produced in refinery units such as catalytic crackers, cokers, hydrocrackers, and reformers are sent to the Gas Processing Unit [1] in order to:
In some refineries, Gas Processing Units also function as Light End Units.
[1] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 13, Supporting Processes, pp. 278-280.
Sour gas separated in the Gas Processing unit is sent to the Amine Unit for acid gas removal using chemical solvents such as monoethanolamine (MEA), or diethanolamine (DEA), as shown in Figure 10.2.
As shown in Figure 10.2, the sour gas is pumped from the bottom of an absorption column to get in contact with the basic solution (typically 15-30wt% diethanolamine) to capture H2S (and other acidic gases such as CO2) in the solution. The rich solution containing the acid gases is sent to a flash drum to recover the C1 and C2 hydrocarbons from the rich solution to be used as fuel gas in the refinery to generate process heat, or steam in fired furnaces. The rich solvent is then sent to a regenerator still to remove the acid gases that are sent to the sulfur recovery unit. The remaining solvent is cooled in a heat exchanger and recycled to the absorption unit to close the loop [2].
[2] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 13, Supporting Processes, pp. 280-283.
As indicated in Figure 10.3, the objective of the sulfur recovery process is to convert H2S to elemental sulfur. Sulfur recovery takes place in a series of two steps: Claus Process and SCOT Process [3]. In the Modified Claus Process, partial combustion of H2S takes place to generate SO2 that is reacted with the remaining H2S to recover sulfur as elemental sulfur. The Modified Claus Process, once-through burner operation, works only with acid gases that contain more than 50% H2S by volume. In the process, hydrogen in H2S is converted to H2O. The second stage, the SCOT Process, functions as a tail gas clean-up operation to remove the sulfur compounds produced in the side reactions of the Claus Process, i.e., carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide (CS2).
[3] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 13, Supporting Processes, pp. 283-290.
Figure 10.4 shows the configuration of the multi-step Modified Claus Process that includes two kinds of reactors: a burner reactor and a converter reactor. In the burner reactor, H2S is burned with compressed air to SO2 and H2O. Two critically important variables of the burner reactor are the oxygen to H2S ratio and the reactor temperature. The O2/H2S ratio needs to be one-third of the stoichiometric ratio for complete combustion of H2S. The significance of the O2/H2S will be discussed further in the next section. The temperature in the burner reactor must be maintained typically at 1850°F to make sure that any ammonia present in the feed gas is completely destroyed to protect the catalysts in the converter reactor. The effluent gas from the burner reactor is cooled to 450°F (above the dew point of S) in the waste heat boiler as it enters the converter reactor for catalytic conversion of H2S and SO2 to elemental sulfur and water. The converter effluent is introduced into a condenser unit to obtain elemental sulfur as a liquid product. Small quantities of S produced in the burner reactor may also be recovered after the waste heat boiler. Typically, three sets of converter-condenser units in series are needed to achieve 95% recovery of S in the Modified Claus Process.
Figure 10.5 shows the principal reactions in the Modified Claus Process in the burner and converter-reactor sections. In the burner, H2S is partially oxidized to produce H2O and SO2. In the reactor converter, the burner product SO2 reacts with the remaining H2S to produce elemental sulfur (the intended product in the sulfur recovery process) along with the side product water. Ideally, the final products should consist only of elemental sulfur and water with no H2S or SO2 present. The only way to achieve the intended product mix is to control the O2/H2S ratio in the burner. As can be seen, the stoichiometric ratio of O2/H2S for complete conversion of H2S to SO2 is 3/2 which would effectively convert all H2S to SO2. In order to reserve part of the feed H2S to react with the burner product so that no H2S or SO2 remains in the final product from the converter, the O2/H2S ratio should be controlled at 1/3 of the stoichiometric ratio, that is (1/3)(3/2)=1/2. As a self-check exercise, explain with chemical equations why the desired oxygen/hydrogen sulfide ratio in the feed to the Burner in the Claus Process should be 1/3 of the stoichiometric oxygen/hydrogen sulfide ratio (for complete combustion of hydrogen sulfide). The answer to this exercise is given at the end of the lesson.
As seen in Figure 10.5, the side reactions in the burner produce COS and CS2 which cannot be converted in the catalytic reactions that take place in the converter reactor. Therefore, a tail gas clean-up process, or SCOT Process, is needed to reduce the concentration of these side products to less than 20 ppm by volume in the outlet.
Figure 10.6 illustrates how the SCOT Process is integrated with the Claus Unit to convert COS, CS2 and any remaining SO2 by reacting with H2 in the catalytic reactor back to H2S to be recycled to the Claus Unit to close the loop. The hydrogenating catalysts used in SCOT contain nickel or tungsten on alumina support, and the reaction takes place at 480-570°. By coupling Claus and SCOT processes, more than 99% of sulfur entering the Claus unit can be recovered as elemental sulfur to be sold as a refinery product.
Although refineries produce a significant quantity of hydrogen needed for hydrotreating and hydroconversion processes, in most cases, additional hydrogen is needed particularly for refining the sour crudes. Therefore, a Hydrogen Plant is needed on site to provide the additional hydrogen demand. As seen in Figure 10.7, steam reforming of natural gas is most commonly used in the U.S. to produce hydrogen, whereas partial oxidation of heavy hydrocarbons is preferred in Europe [4].
For the partial oxidation process, a heavy hydrocarbon fraction, typically fuel oil, is reacted at high pressures (1300-1800 psig) with pure oxygen supplied in strictly controlled quantities for partial oxidation of hydrocarbons to carbon monoxide and hydrogen, as shown in Figure 10.7. Carbon monoxide produced in the reaction is converted to hydrogen by catalytic shift reaction with steam. In the purification step, CO2 produced in the shift reaction is removed by absorption in a basic solvent such as potassium carbonate.
Figure 10.8 illustrates the reactions in steam reforming of natural gas (CH4) to produce hydrogen in the U.S. refineries. In the reforming reaction, CH4 is converted to H2 and CO on a NiO/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst at temperatures of 760-816°C. Reforming is followed by the water gas shift reaction at 343°C to shift CO to H2 and CO2 on a Cr2O3 and Fe2O3 catalyst in multiple catalyst beds with external cooling to control the temperature to achieve high conversion in the exothermic reaction. The product gas is purified by absorption of CO2 in an Amine Unit. In the final step of methanation, residual CO and CO2 is removed by hydrogenation on a Ni/Al2O3 catalyst at 370-427°C.
[4] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 13, Supporting Processes, pp. 273-278.
Considering the vast amounts of water used in a refinery, wastewater treatment constitutes a very significant supporting process for safe operation. Figure 10.9 lists the different types of wastewater, pollutants involved in wastewater streams, and the major refinery units that generate significant amounts of wastewater. The four types of refinery wastewater include cooling water, process water and steam, storm water, and sanitary sewage water. Among these, the most heavily polluted wastewater stream that requires serious treatment is the process water and steam that come into direct contact with petroleum fractions. Storm water may be contaminated because of incidental exposure to pollutant sources on refinery surfaces and accidental spills. Cooling water and sanitary sewage water may not require much treatment before they are sent to public water treatment facilities. One rule of thumb is to avoid mixing different types of wastewater streams to reduce the load on the treatment units.
Pollutants found in the wastewater streams include hydrocarbons with particular concern for toxic aromatic compounds, such as benzene; heteroatom compounds, such as mercaptans, amines, phenols, and cyanides; dissolved gases such as H2S and NH3, and acids, such as H2SO4 and HF; and suspended and dissolved solids. The refinery units that generate the most significant amount of wastewater are desalting, distillation, thermal and catalytic cracking, coking, as well as heat exchangers and storage tanks [5].
[5] Petroleum Refining, by J. H. Gary, G. E. Handwerk, M. J. Kaiser, 5th Edition, CRC Press NY, 2007, Chapter 13, Supporting Processes, pp. 290-293.
Standard measurements used for wastewater characterization are listed in Figure 10.10. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) measures the amount of oxygen consumed by microorganisms in decomposing organic matter, whereas Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) measures the total oxygen consumption by organic and inorganic chemicals present in water. Both measurements relate to the level of contamination in wastewater, and they are used to gauge the effectiveness of the wastewater treatment processes. Other water quality parameters include the amount of suspended solids, hydrocarbon content, nitrogen content, phenols content, and acidity.
Figures 10.11 and 10.12 illustrate the primary (physical) and secondary (biological) treatment processes, respectively. The primary treatment of sour water contaminated with oils and solid particles involve the stripping of dissolved H2S using steam, float/sink density separation for skimming the floating oil, and the settling tanks to separate heavier oil and solids, usually in multiple stages, before the treated water can be directed to public treatment facilities. The secondary treatment uses micro-organisms to further remove organic contaminants.
Air pollutant emissions from the refinery processes are also controlled. Figure 10.13 lists the major legislations and regulations that affect the environmental impact of refineries in the U.S. [6].
[6] C. S. Khor and A. Elkamel, “Environmental Issues Related to the Petroleum Refining Industry” In Petroleum Refining and Natural Gas Processing, Editors: M. R. Riazi, S. Eser, J. L. Peña, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, pp. 701-716.
Please take a few minutes to complete the exercise and then answer the questions below.
This week Exercise 9 is due.
Supporting processes are essential to the operation of a refinery. These processes have become more important as the crude oil base has become more sour. The demand for hydrogen has increased to support the required finishing processes for heteroatom removal and recovery of sulfur and metals. Refineries have become major producers of elemental sulfur for the chemical industry.
You should now be able to:
You have reached the end of Lesson 10! Double-check the to-do list below to make sure you have completed all of the activities listed there before you begin Lesson 11.
Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignments below can be found within this lesson.
Reading: | J. H. Gary and G. E. Handwerk, Chapter 13 (Supporting Processes) |
---|---|
Assignments: | Exercise 9 |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion Forum (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
In the roughly 150-year history of petroleum refining, remarkable changes have taken place in refining processes and refinery configurations. These changes were driven by transitions and developments in combustion engines, the wars (World War I and, most notably, World War II), variations in the crude oil slate available for refining, and the environmental regulations. This historical evolution has taken place with the introduction of new processes more or less in the order of the four refinery processes that we have discussed: separation, conversion, finishing, and support. The new petroleum refining processes were developed and incorporated into the refinery to control the yield and properties of the desired fuels and refineries. Through the stages of the refinery evolution, it is interesting to note that the demand for even the same petroleum product has changed not only in the desired composition, as it is linked to properties, but also in its application to a particular commercial sector. In this regard, kerosene provides a good example of this change from being primarily a source of light in lamps (as a replacement for whale oil which allegedly saved the sperm whales from extinction) in the 1850s to becoming an established base fuel for jet aircraft since the end of World War II. Kerosene has also been used as a fuel for domestic heating and cooking in many parts of the world, long after the introduction of electric lamps.
This lesson will provide an overview of the historical evolution of the petroleum refinery and discuss some current developments in crude oil supply and in related energy technologies to catch a glimpse of what the near future could bring to the refinery practice. The overview and discussions will often reflect on specific aspects of different refinery processes that have been introduced in previous lessons.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found in this lesson.
Readings: | F. Self, E. Ekholm, and K. Bowers, Refining Overview - Petroleum, Processes and Products, AIChE CD-ROM, 2000. |
---|---|
Assignment: |
Exercise 10: Refinery Flow Diagrams Quiz 4. Will cover material in Lessons 10-11. Check the Syllabus or Course Calendar for Quiz 4 schedule. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
The configuration and complexity of a petroleum refinery has evolved from one-pot batch distillation to produce kerosene as the major product (1850s) to the complex refinery of the day [1] that produces a multitude of fuels and petrochemical feedstocks from a wide range of crude oils, as discussed in Lessons 1 and 2. Different stages of this evolution, in tune with the changing demand for petroleum products as well as the changing crude oil base over time, are presented in the following sections listed below and in your menu.
In the first refineries of the United States, Pennsylvania crude was easily distilled to produce kerosene for lamps (which burned cleanly without producing much smoke because of the paraffinic composition of Penn crude) and lubricating oil for steam engines. Lighter fractions obtained from distillation such as naphtha, propane, and butane were largely considered a nuisance and were flared for disposal because of their high vapor pressure and low flash points that would cause difficulties with storage. Figure 11.1 shows a typical batch distillation process in early refineries of the 1850s used primarily to produce kerosene, labeled as “product” from the separator in the diagram. For the distillation process, crude oil feed was filled into a kettle heated by burning gas, or other fuels in a fire box and the residual tar was removed after the distillation was over. The Dephlegmator Tower worked as a distillation column and as the crude boiled in the still, the vapor fraction from the dephlegmator was condensed and sent to the separator [2]. The separated kerosene fraction often went through a second distillation process to control the flash point for the safe use of fuel in lamps and reduce odor. The residue fraction was also distilled using vacuum to produce lubricating oil and grease for the steam engines and wax for making candles.
Charging the kettle with crude oil and emptying the residue left over from distillation took a lot of time and effort, making the batch distillation highly inefficient. In most cases, the recovered overhead fraction was fed back to the same still to drive off more hydrogen sulfide and lighter fractions to control the flammability (flash point) of kerosene. Driving off hydrogen sulfide and other light sulfur species also reduced the odor of kerosene and of the products obtained from burning kerosene in gas lamps. As the demand increased for kerosene, the refiners began to use two stills, one for the first fractionation of a kerosene cut and the second one to redistill the kerosene for purification. Using two stills in series marked the beginning of the continuous stills [2].
[2.] F. Self, E. Ekholm, and K. Bowers, Refining Overview - Petroleum, Processes and Products, AIChE, 2000, Chapter 4.
Continuous fraction with multiple stills replaced batch operations in the refineries, enabling increased throughputs and the production of multiple distillate fractions as products from a refinery [2]. As shown in Figure 11.2, a series of stills could operate continuously by taking an overhead fraction from the crude oil in the first still by flashing and moving the remaining liquid to a still drum while continuously introducing more fresh feed to the first still. The second still operates at a higher temperature to produce a higher boiling distillate. The reflux to the column with bubble trays was adjusted from the color of the overhead stream, utilizing a “look box,” shown in the diagram in Figure 11.2, to improve separation.
The demand for kerosene as a source of light declined with the invention of the electric light bulb in 1879. However, the first powered airplane flight in 1903 and mass production of an automobile (Model T) in 1908 ushered in a large demand for gasoline that cannot be met by simple distillation. Thermal cracking provided means to increase gasoline supply. This was the beginning of a new era in petroleum refining, incorporating a conversion process with separation processes.
Incorporating thermal cracking of gas oil into the refinery increased the yield of light and middle distillates, i.e., gasoline, kerosene, and diesel fuel, from crude oil. Although the electric light made the kerosene lamps obsolete, there was still continued demand for kerosene in rural regions because of slow electrification outside the urban areas. The evolution of the refinery in the three decades between 1910 and 1940 was driven largely by the development of thermal cracking processes, although finishing (or chemical treating) processes also started to become important in this era to stabilize and purify the products of thermal cracking.
Figure 11.3 shows a simple schematic diagram of the Burton-Clark batch thermal cracking process. The process employed tubular heating similar to those used in a steam boiler. The series of tubes in the firebox circulate the hot gas oil back to the drum by thermal convection for more uniform heating. The hot gases from the coal-fired furnace are directed up over the high end of the tubes and down over the low end of the slanted bundle. Feed is introduced in the low end of the tubes and tar is withdrawn from the bottom set of tubes. The products of thermal cracking are fractionated in the Bubble Tray Tower and in the high-pressure and low-pressure separators. In the high-pressure separator are the gaseous products hydrogen, methane, and ethane, and in the low-pressure separator are the gases ethane and propane and the liquid products gasoline and kerosene.
Figure 11.4 shows the configuration of different processes in the thermal refinery. As different from the thermal processes in a current refinery, the thermal refinery includes processes such as Thermal Polymerization, making gasoline from the light olefins propene and butene; Thermal Reforming, to make relatively high octane number gasoline from straight-run naphtha; and gasification of heavy gas oil with steam, to produce town gas (CO+H2) which predates the use of natural gas in cities for domestic heating and cooking.
The essential driver of the Thermal Refinery was the shift in demand to gasoline from kerosene because of the introduction of the automobile, the airplane, and electricity. The demand for gasoline rapidly increased when the U.S. declared war on Germany in 1917 and became a party in World War I. Thermal refinery processes, thermal cracking, thermal reforming, and thermal polymerization enabled the expansion of gasoline supply [3]. With the introduction of tetraethyl lead (TEL) as an octane number boosting additive in 1923, a growing interest was directed to production of high-performance gasoline which would be defined later as a high-octane number-gasoline after the introduction of a test method to measure the octane number of gasoline as an anti-knock property in 1931. Because of the toxicity of lead, TEL concentration was limited to 3 milliliters per gallon of finished gasoline (approximately 800 ppm by volume). The addition of lead to motor gasoline continued until the 1970s in the United States when the mandate for adding catalytic converters to automobiles took effect in accordance with the Clean Air Act to reduce tailpipe emissions, and the unleaded gasoline was introduced. Lead is still added to aviation gasoline used in turboprop aircraft in quantities 0.3-0.56 g/L in a range of avgas grades, and efforts are underway to remove lead from the aviation gasoline as well in the near future.
Up through 1924, even with the rapid introduction of various thermal cracking processes, only 20% of the gasoline produced in the U.S. came from thermal processes. But after the introduction of TEL, the contribution of gasoline produced by thermal cracking has steadily increased to reach over 50% of the gasoline pool by the end of the age of the Thermal Refinery in 1940. For reasons discussed in Lessons 6 and 7, the Catalytic Refinery arrived in the scene of brutal competition of making high-performance gasoline and other petroleum fuels in the period leading to and during World War II.
[3.] F. Self, E. Ekholm, and K. Bowers, Refining Overview - Petroleum, Processes and Products, AIChE, 2000, Chapter 5.
As discussed in Lessons 6 and 7, the development of catalytic processes has changed the chemistry of petroleum refining from free radical to ionic reactions. World War II provided the stimulus to urgently develop catalytic technologies that were being investigated in the late thirties. The catalytic age of refining, which could be bracketed between1940 and 1970 also brought the advent of the petrochemical industry.
Figure 11.5 shows a configuration of the catalytic refinery which resembles, to a large extent, the current day refineries focused on making high yields of gasoline. The introduction of catalytic cracking, reforming, alkylation, polymerization has revolutionized the ways of making high octane number gasoline. Development of hydrotreatment processes was also an important asset of the catalytic refinery. Hydrotreatment was essential to protect the platinum catalyst used in reforming from sulfur and as a versatile finishing process to replace the chemical treatments used in the thermal refinery to finish fuels.
One should note in Figure 11.5 that the catalytic refinery also incorporated new thermal processes such as delayed coking and visbreaking, and separation processes, such as deasphalting. Principles of chemical engineering have found great applications in the development of the catalytic refinery with particular emphasis on designing different catalytic process configurations (remember Fixed-Bed, Moving-Bed, and Fluid-Bed Catalytic Cracking), catalyst development, thermal efficiency (e.g., FCC) and product yield and selectivity. The catalytic refinery produced large quantities of LPG (for reasons discussed in Lesson 7) and witnessed the increasing demand for kerosene, now as jet fuel. The time-line for the development of refining processes shown in Table 11.1 shows the intense activity of process development, particularly during World War II.
The age of catalytic refining may be considered to have ended in the 1970s, not because new chemistry was introduced, as it happened in the transition from thermal to catalytic refinery or the development of new process concepts. The oil crises of the 1970s highlighted the significance of refinery flexibility with respect to the diversity of crude oil slates. Further, the concerns for environmental pollution by the combustion of petroleum fuels have brought emphasis on more effective finishing processes. These factors lead to the development of the modern refinery focused on processing the heavy ends of petroleum and making cleaner fuels.
Year | Process Name | Purpose | Byproducts, etc. |
---|---|---|---|
1849 | Canadian geologist Abraham Gesner distills kerosine from crude oil | ||
1859 | An oil refinery is built in Baku (Azerbaijan) | ||
1860-1861 |
Oil refineries are built near Oil Creek, Pennsylvania; Petrolia, Ontario, Canada; and Union County, Arkansas |
||
1862 | Atmosphere distillation | Produce kerosine | Naphtha, tar, etc. |
1870 | Vacuum distillation | Lubricants (original) cracking feedstocks (1930s) |
Asphalt, residual coker feedstocks |
1913 | Thermal Cracking | Increase gasoline |
Residual, bunker fuel |
1916 | Sweetening | Reduce sulfur and odor | Sulfur |
1930 | Thermal reforming | Improve octane number | Residual |
1932 | Hydrogenation | Remove sulfur | Sulfur |
1932 | Coking | Produce gasoline base stocks |
Coke |
1933 | Solvent extraction | Improve lubricant viscosity index | Aromatics |
1935 | Solvent dewaxing | Improve pour point | Waxes |
1935 | Catalyst polymerization | Improve gasoline yield and octane number | Petrochemical feedstocks |
1937 | Catalytic cracking | Higher octane gasoline | Petrochemical feedstocks |
1939 | Visbreaking | Reduce viscosity | Increased distillate, tar |
1940 | Alkylation | Increase gasoline octane and yield | High-octane aviation gasoline |
1940 | Isomerization | Produce alkylation feedstock | Naphtha |
1942 | Fluid catalytic cracking | Increase gasoline yield and octane | Petrochemical feedstocks |
1950 | Deasphalting | Increase cracking feedstock | Asphalt |
1952 | Catalytic reforming | Convert low-quality naphtha | Aromatic |
1954 | Hydrodesulfurization | Remove sulfur | Sulfur |
1956 | Inhibitor sweetening | Remove mercaptan | Disulfides |
1957 | Catalytic isomerization | Convert to molecules with high octane number | Alkylation feedstocks |
1960 | Hydrocracking | Improve quality and reduce sulfur | Alkylation feedstocks |
1974 | Catalytic dewaxing | Improve pour point | Wax |
1975 | Residual hydrocracking | Increase gasoline yield from residual | Heavy residuals |
1975 | Catalytic converter | The phaseout of tetraethyl lead begins | Cleaner air |
1990s | SCANfining (Exxon), OCTGAIN (Mobil), Prime G (Axens), and S Zorb (Phillips) | Reformulated gasoline and low-sulfur diesel | Low sulfur fuel |
2000 | Deep or ultra-deep desulfurization (ULSD) | Decrease sulfur level in diesel (2 ppm0 | Sulfur |
Oil crises of 1973 and 1979, which created crude oil price shocks, contributed to an increasing emphasis on energy efficiency and independence. These events along with the stricter environmental regulations set up the evolution of the End of the Century Refinery (or Heavy Ends Conversion Refinery) which has focused on efficient processing of heavy crudes as well as the heavy ends of crude oils to produce higher yields of distillate fuels. Producing cleaner fuels and cleaner operation of refining processes have been mandated by environmental regulations.
Figure 11.6 shows the configuration of the Heavy Ends Conversion refinery, with emphasis on processes marked with the red rectangle in Figure 11.6. These processes include hydrotreating of heavy gas oils before catalytic cracking to remove sulfur that contaminates downstream catalysts and to saturate aromatic C-C bonds to produce higher yields of fuel products from catalytic cracking. With better protection from sulfur contamination, FCC units can use modified catalysts to increase gasoline yield and reduce coke yield.
HECR offers four primary heavy oil or residue processing technologies as options for processing heavy crudes or “bottom-of-the barrel” processing. These processes have become more important as the world crude slate becomes heavier and more contaminated with sulfur and other heteroatom species, as sulfur limits become more stringent with environmental regulations.
Hydrocracking of heavy oils removes downstream catalyst contaminants and saturate aromatic compounds to produce higher yields of fuel products. Hydrocracking offers flexibility to choose between gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel fuel by coordinating the operations of fluid catalytic cracking and hydrocracking.
Other options for residue processing include coking, visbreaking, and deasphalting. Coking followed by catalytic upgrading of coking products (naphtha and gas oils) by hydrogenation, or hydrocracking generates high-quality distillates from residua that are not suitable for catalytic processes due to large concentrations of asphaltenes and heteroatom compounds (sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, metals). Visbreaking and deasphalting removes the highly reactive compounds and asphaltenes from residua making the visbroken and deasphalted oils attractive feedstocks for catalytic hydroprocessing to produce distillate fuels.
The End of the 20th Century Refinery (the present-day refinery) is much more complex and versatile than its predecessor, The Catalytic Refinery. In addition, there are differences that are not so visible in conventional descriptions and flow sheets, such as computerized control of the operations and on-line measurements of product composition and properties.
Speculation about the future of refining is risky at best, but some trends are described as to be more certain by Self, Ekholm, and Bowers [5], as follows:
Figure 11.7 lists four factors that may influence the future of petroleum refining, including product demand, crude supply, environmental regulations, and new technology development. It is expected that in the near future, the demand for distillate fuels will keep increasing, while the conventional crude oil slate will become heavier and more contaminated. This conflict between the trends in supply and demand that is aggravated by stricter environmental regulations on the purity of fuels can be mitigated by new and more effective technologies (processes and catalysts). Although the conventional crude oils are becoming heavier (Figure 11.8), non-conventional liquids such as synthetic crude oil from oil sands in Canada and shale gas liquid by-products are lighter than the conventional crude oils and could be used as blend components to dilute the heavy crudes. Natural gas liquids and coal-derived liquids may also be used as alternative feedstocks for refining. The diversity in crude oil supply calls out the need to plan/operate a more flexible and versatile refinery.
[1.] F. Self, E. Ekholm, and K. Bowers, Refining Overview - Petroleum, Processes and Products, AIChE, 2000, Chapter 1.
Figure 11.9 recaps some considerations for the future refinery, as discussed above, and lists the future challenges that include the need to process heavier and more contaminated crude oils to produce cleaner products than before. Production of diesel from highly aromatic by-product from FCC (LCO) remains a concern for the cost and quality of diesel fuel produced in the U.S. refineries. Also, extensive hydrotreatment to comply with the limits on heteroatom levels in fuels would negatively affect the octane numbers of gasoline because during hydrotreatment, olefins and aromatic compounds may be hydrogenated, thus reducing the octane number. No such conflict exists for diesel fuel, because cetane number of diesel actually increases with hydrogenation. It is clear that the hydrogen demand for the future refinery will keep increasing, and refineries will build or expand the existing hydrogen production capacity.
Please take a few minutes to work through the review questions. These questions will help you study for the final.
The assignments for this week include Exercise 10 and Quiz 4.
You may use PowerPoint to draw the diagrams, or scan neatly hand-drawn diagrams and submit as a PDF to the Assignment.
Once you have a solution to the exercises you will submit your answers as a PDF by uploading your file to be graded.
Quiz 4. Will cover material in Lessons 10-11. Check the Syllabus, or Course Calendar for Quiz 4 schedule.
The evolution of petroleum refinery can be considered to have taken in four stages from being just a separation refinery (distillation and dewaxing) to a conversion refinery in accordance with the demand for petroleum products. The conversion refinery evolved first as a thermal refinery with the development of thermal cracking, reforming, and polymerization, and transitioned into the catalytic refinery during World War II, with the development of processes such as catalytic cracking, catalytic reforming, alkylation, and catalytic hydrotreatment to define the finishing processes. The next stage of evolution after the catalytic refinery, high-end conversion refinery, has kept all the catalytic processes and added hydrocracking with emphasis on processing the heavy crude oils and production of cleaner fuels in compliance with environmental regulations. The increasing demand for hydrogen for hydrocracking and hydrotreatment operations and the need to recover increasing quantities of elemental sulfur highlighted the requirement of supporting processes for the operation of this refinery.
Reminder - Complete all of the Lesson 11 tasks!
Readings: | F. Self, E. Ekholm, and K. Bowers, Refining Overview - Petroleum, Processes and Products, AIChE CD-ROM, 2000. |
---|---|
Assignment: | Exercise 10: Construct refinery flow diagrams. Quiz 4. Will cover material in Lessons10-11. Check the syllabus and course calendar for Quiz 4 schedule. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Natural gas has become a very significant fossil fuel in the U.S. because of a sharp increase in shale gas production starting in 2006. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that the U.S. natural gas production will increase 44% from 23.0 trillion cubic feet in 2011 to 33.1 trillion cubic feet in 2040 [1]. Almost all of this increase in domestic natural gas production is due to projected growth in shale gas production, which is projected to grow from 7.8 trillion cubic feet in 2011 to 16.7 trillion cubic feet in 2040. It is interesting to note that before the shale gas boom (that has taken place largely in Pennsylvania), the U.S. was planning to import liquefied natural gas (LNG) from countries as far as Peru with the planned construction of LNG ports in California and other states. Currently, there are prospects of exporting LNG overseas in the near future. One particular aspect of the natural gas boom that concerns the petroleum refining industry is the increased production of natural gas liquids (NGL) that are co-produced with natural gas. NGL consist of light hydrocarbons, and they have become an important non-conventional feedstock for refineries, contributing mainly to gasoline production. This new input to refineries along with the increased domestic oil production by the new drilling technology has helped small inland refineries that do not have easy access to imported crude oil as, for example, Gulf Coast refineries.
This lesson will provide an overview of the natural gas processing that employs the same techniques and processes as we have covered in petroleum refining operations, such as in Light Ends Unit for fractionation of light hydrocarbons, and recovering H2S, as well as its conversion to S. Brief introductions to shale gas and natural gas liquids will be presented before discussing the natural gas processing.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
This lesson will take us one week to complete. Please refer to the Course Syllabus for specific time frames and due dates. Specific directions for the assignment below can be found in this lesson.
Readings: | Natural Gas |
---|---|
Assignments: |
Review the DOE page on shalle gas: https://www.energy.gov/articles/producing-natural-gas-shale [16] |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Shale gas refers to natural gas that is trapped within shale formations, as different from conventional natural gas resources, such as associated (produced with crude oil), or non-associated (without crude oil) natural gas that is found mostly in sandstone formations. Shales are fine-grained sedimentary rocks that can be rich sources of petroleum and natural gas. Over the past decade, the combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has allowed access to large volumes of shale gas that were previously uneconomical to produce. The production of natural gas from shale formations has invigorated the natural gas industry and the small inland refineries in the United States.
Figure 12.1 shows the EIA data and projections on dry natural gas production in the U.S., indicating the surge in shale gas production, while the conventional associated and non-associated gas production are expected to decline [3]. Dry natural gas refers to natural gas that consists, essentially, of methane without any significant concentration of condensable hydrocarbons, such as propane and butane, that are present in natural gas liquids.
[2.] Natural Gas Overview [18]
[3.] What are Natural Gas Liquids? [19]
Natural gas liquids (NGLs) are composed of hydrocarbons, including ethane, propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, and higher alkanes. Although ethane cannot be readily liquefied by pressure at ambient temperature such as propane and butane (LPG) it is considered a component of NGL. There are many uses for NGLs, as summarized in Table 12.1 [3]. NGLs are extracted from the natural gas production stream in field processing plants, using techniques discussed related to petroleum refining operations.
NGL field production is growing in the United States, representing an important part of the supply picture.
Natural Gas Liquid | Chemical Formula | Applications | End Use Products | Primary Sectors |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ethane |
C2H6
|
Ethylene for plastics production; petrochemical feedstock | Plastic bags; plastics; anti-freeze; detergent | Industrial |
Propane | C3H8 | Residential and commercial heating; cooking fuel; petrochemical feedstock | Home heating; small stoves and barbeques; LPG | Industrial, Residential, Commercial |
Natural Gas Liquid | Chemical Formula | Applications | End Use Products | Primary Sectors |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ethane |
C2H6 |
Ethylene for plastics production; petrochemical feedstock | Plastic bags; plastics; anti-freeze; detergent | Industrial |
Propane |
C3H8 |
Residential and commercial heating; cooking fuel; petrochemical feedstock | Home heating; small stoves and barbeques; LPG | Industrial, Residential, Commercial |
Butane |
C4H10 |
Petrochemical feedstock; blending with propane or gasoline | Synthetic rubber for tires; LPG; lighter fuel | Industrial, Transportation |
Isobutane |
C4H10 |
Refiner feedstock; petrochemical feedstock | Alkylate for gasoline; aerosols; refrigerant | Industrial |
Pentane |
C5H12 |
Natural gasoline; blowing agent for polystyrene foam | Gasoline; polystyrene; solvent | Transportation |
Pentanes Plus* | Mix of C5H12 and heavier | Blending with vehicle fuel; exported for bitumen production in oil sands | Gasoline; ethanol blends; oil sands production | Transportation |
C indicates carbon, H indicates hydrogen; Ethane contains two carbon atoms and six hydrogen atoms
*Pentanes plus is also known as "natural gasoline." Contains pentane and heavier hydrocarbons.
Table 12.2. Some components and applications of natural gas liquids [3].
Source: US Energy Information Administration
[3.] What are Natural Gas Liquids? [19]
Natural gas as recovered at the wellhead consists of mostly methane (C1), but it contains other hydrocarbons, principally ethane (C2), propane (C3), butanes (C4), and pentanes C5 that constitute the natural gas liquids, as discussed in the previous section. Raw natural gas also contains water vapor, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon dioxide, nitrogen, helium, and other impurities, such as mercury. Table 12.3 gives some examples of the composition of natural gas produced in three different locations, to give an example that methane content of natural gas can be as low as 65%. One can also note in Figure 12.2 that some natural gas streams may contain high concentrations of H2S and N2. Some natural gas streams could be a commercial source for helium [4]. One of the important objectives of natural gas processing is to remove the corrosive and toxic gas H2S and convert it to elemental sulfur, as will be discussed later. Important impurities, including those shown in Table 12.3, that need to be removed from natural gas are listed below [5].
Canada | Kansas | Texas | |
---|---|---|---|
C1 | 77.1 | 73.0 | 65.8 |
C2 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 3.8 |
C3 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 1.7 |
C4s | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
C5s+ | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
H2S | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
CO2 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
N2 | 3.2 | 14.7 | 25.6 |
He | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.8 |
Considering that the principal transportation of natural gas over land is by pipeline, natural gas specifications for pipeline transmission have been developed. Table 12.4 gives the natural gas specifications that need to be satisfied for pipeline transportation. Note that in addition to the specified impurity levels for the contaminants, the specifications include the heating value of natural gas (950 -1150 Btu/scf) which depends on the composition, particularly the concentration of inert gases (e.g., N2 and CO2) and other diluents.
Table 12.4. Specifications for pipeline quality natural gas [6].
[4.] A. J. Kidnay and W. R. Parrish, Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006, p.9.
[5.] A. J. Kidnay and W. R. Parrish, Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006, p.10.
[6.] A. J. Kidnay and W. R. Parrish, Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006, p.16.
A comparison of Images 12.2 and 12.3 illustrates the significance of natural gas processing for purification of the raw natural gas to obtain a pipeline quality gas. In general, natural gas processing includes the following steps:
In addition to these processes, it is often necessary to install scrubbers and heaters at or near the wellhead. The scrubbers remove sand and other large-particle impurities. The heaters ensure that the temperature of the natural gas does not drop too low and form a hydrate with the water in the gas stream. Natural gas hydrates are crystalline ice-like solids or semi-solids that can impede the passage of natural gas through valves and pipes.
A generalized natural gas flow diagram is shown in Figure 12.2 [7]. After initial scrubbing to remove particles, the first step in natural gas processing is the removal of condensate (oil) and water that is achieved by controlling the temperature and pressure of the inlet stream from the well, as shown in Figure 12.4. Gas separated in this unit is sent to acid gas recovery; the condensate or the oil recovered is usually sent to a refinery for processing, while water is disposed, or treated as wastewater.
Acid gases (H2S and CO2) are separated usually by absorption in an amine solution, as discussed for H2S recovery in a petroleum refinery in Lesson 10. The recovered H2S is sent to a combined Claus-SCOT (Tail Gas Treating) unit to be converted to elemental sulfur, as was also discussed in Lesson 10. After removing the acid gases, the natural gas stream is sent to a dehydration unit to remove water typically by absorption in a glycol unit, followed by mercury removal (by adsorption on activated carbons or other sorbents), and nitrogen rejection either cryogenically, or by adsorption, or absorption depending on the nitrogen concentration. The last step in the processing sequence is the Natural Gas Liquids (NGL) extraction, fractionation, and treatment, as described in Figure 12.4.
Natural gas liquids (NGLs) have a higher value as separate products.
Two basic steps: 1) Extraction, 2) Fractionation
NGL extraction can be carried out by absorption in oil that selectively absorbs hydrocarbons heavier than methane, or by a cryogenic expansion and external refrigeration to condense NGL.
Following the NGL extraction, the treated natural gas stream that is, now, mostly methane, or a gas compliant with the natural gas specifications is sent to the pipeline for transmission to the point of use. The extracted NGL, on the other hand, is sent to a fractionation unit that operates like Light Ends Unit in a refinery, as discussed in Lesson 5, separating ethane, propane, butane, and naphtha (>C5, natural gasoline). Note that the fractionation unit may also include a butane splitter or deisobutanizer to separate n-butane and iso-butane. You may remember from Lesson 8 that iso-butane is a feedstock to alkylation to produce high-octane gasoline when reacted with C3 and C4 olefins. NGL from highly sour gases may need additional treatment to remove mercaptans and other sulfur species before NGL leaves the processing plant.
[6. ]A. J. Kidnay and W. R. Parrish, Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006, p.16.
[7.] M.R. Riazi, S. Eser, J. L. Peña Díez, and S. S. Agrawal, “Introduction” In Petroleum Refining and Natural Gas Processing, Editors: M. R. Riazi, S. Eser, J. L. Peña, S. S. Agrawal, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, p.12.
Please take a few minutes to work through the questions below. They will help you study for the quiz this week.
Review the US DOE web page on shale gas [20].
The material in the section on Shale Gas Basics is included in the coverage of the final exam.
Final exam is comprehensive and will cover all the course material in Lessons 1-12. Will be given Finals Week. Check the schedule.
Natural gas has gained prominence in the energy scene as a rising fossil fuel following the development of new drilling technology that set up a boom in shale gas production. As crude oil, natural gas contains wide-ranging impurities in addition to the main component, methane. Natural Gas Processing removes the contaminants in the raw gas and recovers some valuable byproducts, such as natural gas liquids. A number of separation and recovery processes used in a petroleum refinery can also be used for natural gas processing.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
Readings: | Natural Gas |
---|---|
Assignments: |
Review the US DOE web page on shale gas [21]. The material in the section on Shale Gas Basics is included in the coverage of the final exam. |
If you have any questions, please post them to our Help Discussion (not email), located in Canvas. I will check that discussion forum daily to respond. While you are there, feel free to post your own responses if you, too, are able to help out a classmate.
Links
[1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1QB1a5XJa_nTHD2lzr7Ew
[2] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
[3] http://www.eia.gov/
[4] https://www.eia.gov/
[5] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
[6] http://www.astm.org/
[7] http://www.iso.org/
[8] http://uk.ihs.com/collections/
[9] http://www.api.org/
[10] http://www.afnor.org/
[11] https://csmgeo.csm.jmu.edu/geollab/Fichter/SedRx/Clastic.html#ternary
[12] http://www.tradekorea.com/products/Distillation_Tower.html
[13] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/fsc432/content/characterization-factors
[14] https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=8_NA_8PS_NUS_S&f=A
[15] https://www.e-education.psu.edu/fsc432/sites/www.e-education.psu.edu.fsc432/files/Lesson9/Table%2012.7%20%28Pour%20Point%20Blending%20Indices%20for%20Distillate%20Stocks%29.xlsx
[16] https://www.energy.gov/articles/producing-natural-gas-shale
[17] http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/
[18] http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/
[19] http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5930&src=email
[20] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/where-our-natural-gas-comes-from.php
[21] http://energy.gov/fe/shale-gas-101